We performed a comparison between Check Point Harmony Endpoint and Forescout Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"The stability is very good."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"Administratively, it's easy to control."
"It monitors data flow across the networking system to enhance comprehensive workflow infrastructure."
"Check Point Harmony Endpoint can be easily deployed and is cost effective and more secure."
"Its stability during any heavy performance activity is excellent."
"Information is easily managed and protected (which is particularly useful in lost or stolen endpoints)."
"It offers complete endpoint protection for all assets."
"The solution has all the standard features you would expect for endpoint protection."
"Cost-wise it's cheaper than other options."
"This is clearly the best product for the NAC use cases in this field for Forescout."
"Obtaining visibility into the network and connected devices is very simple with this tool. It takes me three minutes to do a base deployment when all the parameters are available."
"The actions that the agentless visibility, allow us to perform on the endpoint, are really amazing, especially in the way that it is done."
"The visibility is the main benefit. We now know how many devices are connected, what the use for each device is and what kind of devices we have in our environment."
"The product is very easy to work with and easy to deploy."
"The user management has been very easy for the most part."
"Within three or four days, we have complete visibility of your infrastructure on the network. Compared to other solutions, the deployment of the solution is easier and we can close the project quickly."
"The interface is easy to use."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"Detections could be improved."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"It gives you an alert for malicious sites, which, after searching on the Google database, don't come out to be the same."
"We did have some early compatibility issues, which I hope Check Point has since resolved."
"I would like to see more automation."
"We would like to make the documentation for more modern solutions like the Harmony family easier to find."
"Sometimes the portal loads slowly which should be improved."
"Sometimes, with a lot of clients (1,000) the UI is a bit sluggish."
"Off the top of my head, I can't think of a way it has improved my organization."
"It would be ideal if they had a migration tool of some sort."
"Forescout Platform could improve the vulnerability management as well as the control on the endpoint, which needs to be connected to my network."
"We experienced some detection issues when checking compliance for the Sophos agent."
"I should be able to integrate my Forescout with any other third party security technology, to build that connected security strategy."
"Custom integrations need to be better."
"The fact that Forescout Platform doesn't have a presence in the South African region is a weakness because of which you can't ask for help from them if you have any problems."
"It does not support the TACACS+ protocol."
"The solution needs more definitive pricing. The costs are hard to nail down."
"Forescout Platform isn't flexible with connections to devices like printers and forces you to re-enter details like the MAC address after any breakdowns."
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is ranked 8th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 101 reviews while Forescout Platform is ranked 4th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 69 reviews. Check Point Harmony Endpoint is rated 8.8, while Forescout Platform is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Endpoint writes "Excellent anti-ransomware protection, zero-day phishing protection, and web browsing filtering". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Forescout Platform writes "We can go granular on each endpoint, quarantine non-compliant machines, and target vulnerabilities through scripting". Check Point Harmony Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and SentinelOne Singularity Complete, whereas Forescout Platform is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Nozomi Networks and Armis. See our Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Forescout Platform report.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.