We performed a comparison between Check Point Harmony Endpoint and N-able EDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)."The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The remote support is good."
"It provides remote access for the staff and increases their productivity."
"This software incorporates security AI features and effectively manages bandwidth with its DRS capabilities."
"The security is its most valuable feature."
"It monitors data flow across the networking system to enhance comprehensive workflow infrastructure."
"The most valuable feature is forensics."
"The end-user facilities for managing the tool are good."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"The support needs improvement."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"I have a few issues when attempting to install Harmony on some of the machines."
"I think some work needs to be done to improve the integration with other third-party products, namely SIEM solutions."
"We would like to make the documentation for more modern solutions like the Harmony family easier to find."
"I would like to see is this same solution being able to link with the services of different corporate networks as if they were a remote access VPN extension and thus not require additional licenses."
"I would like to see them add features where we can use this license for mobile browsers, too."
"They need to make the user interface on the server more intuitive and user-friendly."
"Sometimes, with a lot of clients (1,000) the UI is a bit sluggish."
"The patch management and upgrades are not timely."
"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."
Earn 20 points
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is ranked 8th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 102 reviews while N-able EDR is ranked 56th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Check Point Harmony Endpoint is rated 8.8, while N-able EDR is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Endpoint writes "Excellent anti-ransomware protection, zero-day phishing protection, and web browsing filtering". On the other hand, the top reviewer of N-able EDR writes "Stable, effective rollback feature, and useful AI models". Check Point Harmony Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and SentinelOne Singularity Complete, whereas N-able EDR is most compared with SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Cisco Secure Endpoint, Elastic Security and ESET Inspect.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.