We performed a comparison between Check Point Infinity and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in ATP (Advanced Threat Protection)."It is a scalable product."
"We can add our environments and can configure and manage them easily which is why administrators are happy with this tool."
"It has come to reinforce the security architecture of the organization since it covers all the necessary pieces of security."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from factors like ease of use, visibility, and cost to the enterprise."
"Powerful cyber security functionalities track workflows to block all threats that may arise and affect the workflow chain."
"The initial implementation was accomplished easily and without deployment problems."
"For me, one of the best features of Check Point Infinity is to be able to have the possibility of emulating the activity of attached files with malicious content in such a short time."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point Infinity is the ease of use and navigation."
"The most important feature is managing the credentials and implementing those policies which rotate the credentials. Session Manager is also key in not letting the users have access to those credentials. Instead, CyberArk actually manages everything by itself."
"The automatic rotation of credentials is probably the most useful feature."
"The credentials management capability is key to ensuring that the credentials are kept secure and that access to them is done on a temporary and event-driven basis."
"Lessens the risk with privileged access."
"CyberArk has resulted in a massive increase in our security footprint."
"Ensures accounts are managed according to corporate policies."
"There are no issues with scalability. Our clients are very happy to use the product."
"It enables companies to automate password management on target systems gaining a more secure access management approach."
"I think that the pricing for the Check Point products should be reconsidered, as we found it to be quite expensive to purchase and to maintain."
"The endpoint solutions offered by Check Point are not prominent enough in the market due to Check Point's poor marketing efforts."
"While Check Point Infinity is a robust and innovative solution, some areas could benefit from improvement. One area is the user-friendly integration of privacy-focused features."
"They need to update the guides."
"The tool's technical support lags."
"We'd like to see support for fiber connections."
"In the future, I would like to see new developments that allow us to centralize the cloud."
"The portal is provisioned in AWS. They should improve the cloud to make it faster."
"New functionalities and discovered bugs take longer to patch. We would greatly appreciate quicker development of security patches and bug corrections."
"We would like to expand the usage of the auto discovery accounts feed, then on our end, tie in the REST API for automation."
"One thing that could be improved is to create of a better alternative for fixing group policy fees. We currently use Microsoft, but they have introduced new policies that may not be compatible."
"There is some stuff that we still have not fully integrated, which is our AIM solution. We are having all types of issues with it. I have been working with Level 3 support on it, but otherwise, from a functionality perspective, everything has been working except for the AIM solution."
"One of our current issues is a publishing issue. If we whitelist Google Chrome, all the events of Google Chrome should be gone. It is not happening."
"Some of the additional features that we are looking at are in the Conjur product. I am specifically discussing key management, API Keys, and things for connecting applications in the CI/CD pipelines."
"It should be easy to use for non-technical people. Its interface can be a bit difficult. Some parts of its interface are not very intuitive. Some of the controls are hidden, and instead of having a screen with all the controls for that account on it, you have to use menus and other similar things."
"The admin interface of the Password Vault Web Access (PVWA) is moving from an old style (the classic interface) to a new style (the v10 interface) and unfortunately, this process is quite slow."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Infinity is ranked 13th in ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) with 20 reviews while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews. Check Point Infinity is rated 8.8, while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Check Point Infinity writes "Provides robust cybersecurity with a comprehensive suite of features, expert support, and scalable cloud-based architecture, ensuring effective threat detection and continuous improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". Check Point Infinity is most compared with Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Skybox Security Suite, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Proofpoint Email Protection and Microsoft Defender for Office 365, whereas CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard.
We monitor all ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.