Compare Check Point Pointsec vs. Fabasoft Secomo

Check Point Pointsec is ranked 10th in Endpoint Encryption with 1 review while Fabasoft Secomo is ranked 26th in Endpoint Encryption. Check Point Pointsec is rated 7.0, while Fabasoft Secomo is rated 0. The top reviewer of Check Point Pointsec writes "Stable and easy to use, but it needs application identity support". On the other hand, Check Point Pointsec is most compared with , whereas Fabasoft Secomo is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Symantec, Sophos and others in Endpoint Encryption. Updated: May 2020.
417,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.
417,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
10th
out of 27 in Endpoint Encryption
Views
432
Comparisons
340
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
307
Avg. Rating
7.0
26th
out of 27 in Endpoint Encryption
Views
7
Comparisons
2
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
Pointsec
Learn
Check Point
Fabasoft
Overview
Information Not Available

The encryption appliance Secomo has been developed by Fabasoft to provide customers with a way to encrypt their sensitive and valuable data and protect it against unauthorised access.

Offer
Learn more about Check Point Pointsec
Learn more about Fabasoft Secomo
Sample Customers
GlatfelterGraz University of Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Symantec, Sophos and others in Endpoint Encryption. Updated: May 2020.
417,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.