We performed a comparison between Check Point Pointsec [EOL] and McAfee Complete Data Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, McAfee, Sophos and others in Endpoint Encryption."Check Point GAiA is easy to use."
"One of the characteristics that give us the most value is that it offers the ability to perform HTTPS inspections."
"Full disk encryption helps us ensure that data stored on a device is encrypted."
"At the time when this tool was launched on the market, it had new technologies integrated within."
"In the configuration, you can restrict a user from accessing a removable drive."
"Reporting and encryption are its most valuable features."
"I have found the USB part most valuable."
"It is part of the DLP and works well for that use case."
"I am satisfied with the customer service/technical support."
"In addition, it is easy to use, and you can define rules that protect the database beyond the built-in rules of the product. I found another purpose for the product besides the basic things that it does, protecting the database: privileged use, weak authentication, SQL injection and and database platform vulnerability."
"The beauty of McAfee is that they are not looking at encryption from one single standpoint. It is a broader solution."
"The console of the EDR is totally in the cloud."
"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see application identity support."
"We would maybe want (in the future) advanced security in the filtering of access to the metaverse by augmented reality cameras."
"The installation was quite complex."
"The UI was one of the most difficult points to get used to. Due to the UI, even though it was used every day, the administration was complicated."
"We encountered several problems with the solution's stability."
"The product consumes too much RAM and CPU for its processing and this can lead to resource issues on PCs."
"Some clients still receive spam and malware in their attachments, so the data protection isn't working correctly. We have configured it and enabled the features in the client's system, but some policies have failed to work once or twice."
"The product must improve endpoint encryption."
"A better GUI platform would make it easier to present information to management; I would not need to fix the data before I present it."
"Initial setup was complex."
"The UI could be improved a bit."
"We are looking for more granular control over the policies."
More McAfee Complete Data Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Check Point Pointsec [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Endpoint Encryption with 4 reviews while McAfee Complete Data Protection is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Encryption with 30 reviews. Check Point Pointsec [EOL] is rated 8.0, while McAfee Complete Data Protection is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Pointsec [EOL] writes "Very good disk encryption, secure authentication, and centralized administration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee Complete Data Protection writes "Bandwidth is reduced and online protection does a good job of identifying traits". Check Point Pointsec [EOL] is most compared with , whereas McAfee Complete Data Protection is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Symantec Endpoint Encryption, Cisco Secure Endpoint, Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade and Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption.
See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
