We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and Claroty Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Microsoft, Citrix and others in Remote Access."The management of the solution is very simple. It allows for a single view of all the endpoints."
"The safety of online interactions when working with this product has enabled members to convene productive meetings without fear of being attacked."
"We can integrate remote access to our branches through Check Point services."
"Among its most valuable features is how it quickly and easily connects everyone to the VPN service."
"Once we install and connect the VPN service, it keeps on running until we disconnect."
"The most valuable feature is the seamless access."
"Scalability is great. We have been able to grow as a corporation due in part to this type of solution."
"It is stable most of the time."
"The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts."
"The authentication that we handle is through a .p12 certificate, however, we have integrated it with a 2MFA service through another provider. Something that could improve Check Point is if it had its own 2MFA service through a blade or some sort of application."
"It would be good to have Remote Access VPN solutions for Check Point edge services."
"There were some issues with automation and instability."
"For Linux machines, they don't have a full client to install. For the users that utilize Linux, there needs to be an equivalent."
"They could add more features, like the security to block off the doors, or create another hatch, something like this. They could make the features safer, add malware to make my mail and the Kryon system safer and to protect data at an earlier stage."
"Improvements for Check Point Remote Access VPN could include enhancing mobile connectivity for a smoother user experience."
"They need to increase their timeout. Right now, it will fail after ten seconds, however, it shouldn't fail until after 20. If you don't get on your phone right away and check on your authentications, it will kick you out."
"Sometimes it causes the consumption of machine resources, and also improves the scanning since they consume many resources in the clients' machines."
"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 4th in Remote Access with 60 reviews while Claroty Platform is ranked 22nd in Remote Access with 1 review. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while Claroty Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Claroty Platform writes "Provides good visibility of the devices in a user's environment". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, whereas Claroty Platform is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Tenable OT Security, Dragos, Darktrace and SCADAfence.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.