Compare Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
522,946 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The ability to create your trigger data domains is the solution's most valuable feature.""The management of the solution is very simple. It allows for a single view of all the endpoints.""The initial set up is not complex.""Our users find the interface very comfortable to use.""It allows everyone to work from home. If no one could work from home, then we wouldn't have a company, especially now during COVID-19. It's mission-critical, especially since it's currently being used. If there is a problem with it, we would really be screwed. We would be hard-pressed because we would have to figure out what solution we're going to go with, how to deploy it, how long it would take to deploy it, and how we'd even get it on people's computers if we couldn't VPN to them. It would be near impossible to just change to a new VPN solution right now.""It is easy to install the Endpoint Remote Access VPN client to different platforms.""The most valuable feature is the seamless access.""The biggest advantage of Check Point Remote Access VPN is that we already use the Check Point firewall. We only needed to enable the feature and do the configuration in order to enable the VPN feature. We didn't need to buy or manage new hardware. This was a big advantage."

More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pros »

"Our customers have never complained about the stability""This is a product that is easy to install and integrate, and it is simple to use."

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Pros »

Cons
"The interface itself needs improvement. When you need to create something, you have to go through a lot of steps. It needs to be simplified.""I cannot see the full effect of the endpoint solution because it relies on having access to the DNF queries, which might not go through the Check Point firewall when you're using it for perimeter networks. Check Point will not identify the actual source of the net queries. This may be related to the architecture, however, and not poor product issues. I don't know if it can be improved on the Check Point side or not.""They could add more features, like the security to block off the doors, or create another hatch, something like this. They could make the features safer, add malware to make my mail and the Kryon system safer and to protect data at an earlier stage.""There is always room for innovation and the addition of new features.""When you want to deploy a new Check Point agent, it is really a pain in the butt. For example, Windows 10 now has updates almost every couple of months. It changes the versioning and things under the hood. These are things that I don't understand, because I'm not a Windows person. However, I know that the Check Point client is installed on the Windows machine, and if the Check Point client's not kept up-to-date, then it's functionality breaks. It has to be up-to-date with the Windows versions. Check Point has to update the client more often. Now, the problem is that the Check Point client is not easy to update on remote computers and it's not easy to deploy a new client.""The Compliance software blade is available only for the Windows operating systems family, so no macOS security checks are implemented and performed.""We would like to see support for a layer seven VPN over UDP.""We are very happy with the Windows client. You log in with the VPN for the full client, you do the log in there. But for Linux machines, they don't have a full client to install. It is important because we have some users that use Linux and they don't have a specific application from Check Point to use. That is something that could be improved."

More Check Point Remote Access VPN Cons »

"Cloud services are something that F5 Access Policy Manager could do better""The price of this product can be improved."

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"My understanding is that the pricing and licensing are very competitive, and it's not one of their more expensive products. We buy licenses for the solution and have licenses for the endpoint servers.""The price of this product is good.""Organizations that already have the Check Point NGFW need to purchase an additional license to have access to the VPN functionality."

More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Recently, they have simplified the licensing"

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Access solutions are best for your needs.
522,946 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The biggest advantage of Check Point Remote Access VPN is that we already use the Check Point firewall. We only needed to enable the feature and do the configuration in order to enable the VPN… more »
Top Answer: Go with a third party and get it set up correctly. It may be costly but it's worth it.
Top Answer: We don't have any specific complaints. We are very happy with the Windows client. You log in with the VPN for the full client, you do the log in right from the software itself. For Linux machines… more »
Top Answer: This is a product that is easy to install and integrate, and it is simple to use.
Top Answer: Recently, they have simplified their licensing. Two years ago it was much more complex. It's very simple for our customers to understand; however, the cloud is not simple because it's per consumption… more »
Top Answer: The price of this product can be improved.
Ranking
4th
out of 35 in Remote Access
Views
7,202
Comparisons
5,682
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
751
Rating
8.6
17th
out of 35 in Remote Access
Views
572
Comparisons
464
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
388
Rating
8.5
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Check Point Remote Access VPN, Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN
F5 Access Policy Manager
Learn More
Overview

Provide users with secure, seamless remote access to corporate networks and resources when traveling or working remotely. Privacy and integrity of sensitive information is ensured through multi-factor authentication, endpoint system compliance scanning and encryption of all transmitted data.

At F5, we give our customers the freedom to securely deliver every app, anywhere—with confidence. All F5 products are highly programmable and integrate into any environment, whether on premises or in any cloud. To date, 48 of the Fortune 50 companies rely on F5 to deliver apps that customers and employees can securely access at any time, on any device, from any location.

Offer
Learn more about Check Point Remote Access VPN
Learn more about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
Sample Customers
Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
City Bank, Ricacorp Properties, Miele, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm27%
Manufacturing Company27%
Program Development Consultancy13%
Logistics Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider25%
Computer Software Company23%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider18%
Educational Organization8%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise32%
Large Enterprise50%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business7%
Midsize Enterprise70%
Large Enterprise22%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
522,946 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 4th in Remote Access with 15 reviews while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is ranked 17th in Remote Access with 2 reviews. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.4, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Allows everyone to work from home, which is mission-critical for our organization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) writes "A robust platform that enables our clients to do almost anything". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, OpenVPN Access Server, Zscaler Private Access, TeamViewer and Citrix Gateway, whereas F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is most compared with IBM Security Access Manager, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Active Directory, ForgeRock and Auth0. See our Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) report.

See our list of best Remote Access vendors.

We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.