Compare Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. OpenVPN Access Server

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. OpenVPN Access Server and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The ability to create your trigger data domains is the solution's most valuable feature.""The management of the solution is very simple. It allows for a single view of all the endpoints.""The initial set up is not complex.""Our users find the interface very comfortable to use.""It allows everyone to work from home. If no one could work from home, then we wouldn't have a company, especially now during COVID-19. It's mission-critical, especially since it's currently being used. If there is a problem with it, we would really be screwed. We would be hard-pressed because we would have to figure out what solution we're going to go with, how to deploy it, how long it would take to deploy it, and how we'd even get it on people's computers if we couldn't VPN to them. It would be near impossible to just change to a new VPN solution right now.""It is easy to install the Endpoint Remote Access VPN client to different platforms.""The most valuable feature is the seamless access.""The biggest advantage of Check Point Remote Access VPN is that we already use the Check Point firewall. We only needed to enable the feature and do the configuration in order to enable the VPN feature. We didn't need to buy or manage new hardware. This was a big advantage."

More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pros »

"The features I have found to be most valuable are the levels of encryption I can enact and the compression I can apply to improve throughput.""There is support for multi-factor authentication.""It was very easy to set up users."

More OpenVPN Access Server Pros »

Cons
"The interface itself needs improvement. When you need to create something, you have to go through a lot of steps. It needs to be simplified.""I cannot see the full effect of the endpoint solution because it relies on having access to the DNF queries, which might not go through the Check Point firewall when you're using it for perimeter networks. Check Point will not identify the actual source of the net queries. This may be related to the architecture, however, and not poor product issues. I don't know if it can be improved on the Check Point side or not.""They could add more features, like the security to block off the doors, or create another hatch, something like this. They could make the features safer, add malware to make my mail and the Kryon system safer and to protect data at an earlier stage.""There is always room for innovation and the addition of new features.""When you want to deploy a new Check Point agent, it is really a pain in the butt. For example, Windows 10 now has updates almost every couple of months. It changes the versioning and things under the hood. These are things that I don't understand, because I'm not a Windows person. However, I know that the Check Point client is installed on the Windows machine, and if the Check Point client's not kept up-to-date, then it's functionality breaks. It has to be up-to-date with the Windows versions. Check Point has to update the client more often. Now, the problem is that the Check Point client is not easy to update on remote computers and it's not easy to deploy a new client.""The Compliance software blade is available only for the Windows operating systems family, so no macOS security checks are implemented and performed.""We would like to see support for a layer seven VPN over UDP.""We are very happy with the Windows client. You log in with the VPN for the full client, you do the log in there. But for Linux machines, they don't have a full client to install. It is important because we have some users that use Linux and they don't have a specific application from Check Point to use. That is something that could be improved."

More Check Point Remote Access VPN Cons »

"If there was a Graphical User Interface to help streamline the configuration, I believe OpenVPN would probably venture more into the non-geek realm as it were.""The security needs to be improved because it was a complaint that our customers had.""The high availability deployment is not very straightforward. They can make it simpler. OpenVPN does not support some of the additional protocols that Pulse Secure and Cisco AnyConnect support. They can include support for these additional protocols."

More OpenVPN Access Server Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"My understanding is that the pricing and licensing are very competitive, and it's not one of their more expensive products. We buy licenses for the solution and have licenses for the endpoint servers."

More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice »

"With regard to setup cost, pricing and/or licensing, the simple answer is that you'll need to set aside some time to learn it and experiment with it."

More OpenVPN Access Server Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
479,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The biggest advantage of Check Point Remote Access VPN is that we already use the Check Point firewall. We only needed to enable the feature and do the configuration in order to enable the VPN… more »
Top Answer: As far as I'm aware, Check Point is on the same line of pricing with Pulse at the moment. It's not any different. It is in line with the competition. There are no additional costs that I'm aware of.
Top Answer: We are very happy with the Windows client. You log in with the VPN for the full client, you do the log in there. But for Linux machines, they don't have a full client to install. It is important… more »
Top Answer: It was very easy to set up users.
Top Answer: The high availability deployment is not very straightforward. They can make it simpler. OpenVPN does not support some of the additional protocols that Pulse Secure and Cisco AnyConnect support. They… more »
Top Answer: We are a solution provider and the OpenVPN Access Server was one of the products that we used for our customers. It is used to create remote desktop connections into the cloud network, where people… more »
Ranking
Views
6,527
Comparisons
5,205
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
848
Rating
8.6
Views
9,453
Comparisons
7,713
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
715
Rating
8.7
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Check Point Remote Access VPN, Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN
OpenVPN
Learn More
Overview

Provide users with secure, seamless remote access to corporate networks and resources when traveling or working remotely. Privacy and integrity of sensitive information is ensured through multi-factor authentication, endpoint system compliance scanning and encryption of all transmitted data.

OpenVPN is an open-source software application that implements virtual private network techniques for creating secure point-to-point or site-to-site connections in routed or bridged configurations and remote access facilities.

Offer
Learn more about Check Point Remote Access VPN
Learn more about OpenVPN Access Server
Sample Customers
Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
Verizon, Amazon, Disney, HP, Microsoft, IBM, Samsung
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider26%
Computer Software Company24%
Government6%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider37%
Computer Software Company18%
Media Company6%
Government5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise46%
REVIEWERS
Small Business70%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise10%
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. OpenVPN Access Server and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 4th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 8 reviews while OpenVPN Access Server is ranked 7th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 3 reviews. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.6, while OpenVPN Access Server is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Allows everyone to work from home, which is mission-critical for our organization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenVPN Access Server writes "My solution for connecting two DRBD farms". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Zscaler Private Access, Citrix Gateway, TeamViewer and Pulse Connect Secure, whereas OpenVPN Access Server is most compared with Fortinet FortiClient, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Pulse Connect Secure, F5 BIG-IP and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks. See our Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. OpenVPN Access Server report.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.