We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and TeamViewer Pilot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Microsoft, Citrix and others in Remote Access."Once we install and connect the VPN service, it keeps on running until we disconnect."
"The management of the solution is very simple. It allows for a single view of all the endpoints."
"It allows everyone to work from home. If no one could work from home, then we wouldn't have a company, especially now during COVID-19. It's mission-critical, especially since it's currently being used. If there is a problem with it, we would really be screwed. We would be hard-pressed because we would have to figure out what solution we're going to go with, how to deploy it, how long it would take to deploy it, and how we'd even get it on people's computers if we couldn't VPN to them. It would be near impossible to just change to a new VPN solution right now."
"The IPSec VPN, Mobile Access, and Identity Awareness are three of the blades with which we have been working with since the pandemic. This has given us great mobility, making our network more dynamic."
"The solution offers high scalability as far as adding more users."
"Organizations that already use the Check Point NGFW Solution do not require any additional hardware, which makes the implementation straightforward and reduces the time to go live."
"This platform has developed a reliable communication infrastructure that employees can use to communicate with remote workers."
"The ability to create your trigger data domains is the solution's most valuable feature."
"They need to increase their timeout. Right now, it will fail after ten seconds, however, it shouldn't fail until after 20 seconds."
"Bug Fixes and enhancement requests should be remediated earlier."
"In an environment with multiple cluster checkpoints, the global properties common to all clusters in some cases give problems."
"The main area for improvement is pricing. Another area could be integrating MFA authentication directly into the solution instead of using separate benchmark tools for implementation."
"This is the best version we are using, however, if some changes can be made in the next release, I'd like to see adjustments to the time period and internet connectivity."
"The authentication that we handle is through a .p12 certificate, however, we have integrated it with a 2MFA service through another provider. Something that could improve Check Point is if it had its own 2MFA service through a blade or some sort of application."
"I would like the support to be faster."
"Improved scalability would allow the solution to handle larger numbers of users and devices without a significant impact on performance."
"It's quite power-hungry and some customers complain that it drains the batteries on their smartphones very quickly."
"The location markings can appear incorrectly."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 4th in Remote Access with 60 reviews while TeamViewer Pilot is ranked 28th in Remote Access. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while TeamViewer Pilot is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer Pilot writes "Good tech support ". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, whereas TeamViewer Pilot is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor and TeamViewer.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.