Check Point SandBlast Network vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point SandBlast Network and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The Check Point SandBlast Network gives us incredibly good features.""SandBlast has opened us up to a lot more opportunities where we can offer this service to clients, that way they don't have to go to a third-party to get this specific solution. It comes in the Check Point Infinity Package so it has helped us a lot.""In terms of the scalability, it's expandable across the cloud.""We didn't really have any IPS before. So, Check Point has improved our security posture. People get used to doing things certain ways, which might not be the best or most secure way, and they can't do that now, which just requires more education of the user base. With the endpoint client, we've started to use Check Point for remote access.""The forensics reports and the ability to sandbox malware are its most valuable features.""Preventing zero-day threats and extracting potential threats from incoming files with Threat Extraction is the most valuable feature for us.""It looks out for new cyber ​​threats and generates predictions based on behaviors that are already detected on a daily basis.""It has caught some harmful attachments and downloads."

More Check Point SandBlast Network Pros →

"If we are receiving spam emails, or other types of malicious email coming from a particular email ID, then we are able to block them using this solution.""The scalability has not been a problem. We have deployed the product in very high bandwidth networks. We have never had a problem with the FireEye product causing latency issues within our networks.""Over the thirteen years of using the product, we have not experienced a single compromise in our environment. During the COVID period, we faced numerous DDoS attacks, and the tool proved highly effective in mitigating these threats.""The features that I find most valuable are the MIR (Mandiant Incident Response) for checks on our inbound security.""The product is very easy to configure.""Support is very helpful and responsive.""Improved our systems and our customers' by providing better malware protection, defense against zero-day threats, and improved network security.""We see ROI in the sense that we don't have to react because it stops anything from hurting the network. We can stop it before we have a bigger mess to clean up."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pros →

Cons
"I am very leery right now about the stability. We've had three outages in the last month because of Check Point, not because of something that the customer has done, but because of changes on the Check Point side.""I would like to see some speed improvements, e.g., how quickly you can get through all the menus. It crashes sometimes because we push so much through it. Therefore, I would like to see more small things behind the scenes, such as, back-end stability in terms of the management application.""I would like for them to improve the visibility in the product.""The management of alerts could improve them a bit - especially in event management.""I would like to see these solutions being easier to manage from mobile applications - from either iOS or Android - including other operating systems that appear in the future.""We have found a need for the application to be a bit more elastic, bringing it to SAS services and not IAS.""There should be some customized price reductions in the offered packages.""Most of the time stability is okay, but sometimes, we're not able to contact the cloud. It won't last for long. The product could be faster."

More Check Point SandBlast Network Cons →

"Based on what we deployed, they should emphasize the application filtering and the web center. We need to look deeper into the SSM inspection. If we get the full solution with that module, we don't need to get the SSM database from another supplier.""They can maybe consider supporting some compliance standards. When we are configuring rules and policies, it can guide whether they are compliant with a particular compliance authority. In addition, if I have configured some rules that have not been used, it should give a report saying that these rules have not been used in the last three months or six months so that I disable or delete those rules.""Certain features in Trellix Network Detection and Response, such as using AL-type commands, may initially pose a challenge for those unfamiliar with such commands. However, once users become accustomed to the system, it becomes easier to use.""It would be great if we could create granular reports based on the protocols, types of attacks, regions of attack, etc. Also we would like to easily be able to add exceptions to rules in cases of false positives.""Stability issues manifested in terms of throughput maximization.""It is very expensive, the price could be better.""Management of the appliance could be greatly improved.""I would love to see better reporting. Because you can't export some of the reports in proper formats, it is hard to extract the data from reports."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We have seen ROI."
  • "We would like to try the Threat Extraction blade, but you need to buy a license. Check Point is expensive. I would like to buy things, but I would need the funding."
  • "Choosing the correct set of licenses is essential because, without the additional software blade licenses, the Check Point gateways are just a stateful firewall."
  • "I think the overall cost for introducing Check Point with SandBlast was reasonable and competitive in the market."
  • "The cost is not significantly high and it can be negotiated during any purchase of NGFW."
  • "The cost of Check Point SandBlast Network is annually, and there is only a standard license."
  • "The pricing is quite effective, not excessively high. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest price, I rate the pricing a nine."
  • More Check Point SandBlast Network Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."
  • "The pricing is a little high."
  • "Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."
  • "There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."
  • "We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."
  • "FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."
  • "When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."
  • "The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."
  • More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution can detect and prevent attacks that may be encrypted.
    Top Answer:The cost and licensing will always be expensive. That said, we opted for this tool and removed two others, so we felt we achieved a good amount of savings.
    Top Answer:The configuration could be optimized. The usability could improve. They need to make the guides more specific with images, as it is very complicated to guess where each option is located. The… more »
    Top Answer:Over the thirteen years of using the product, we have not experienced a single compromise in our environment. During the COVID period, we faced numerous DDoS attacks, and the tool proved highly… more »
    Top Answer:Certain features in Trellix Network Detection and Response, such as using AL-type commands, may initially pose a challenge for those unfamiliar with such commands. However, once users become… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,868
    Comparisons
    1,162
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    452
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    1,942
    Comparisons
    1,376
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    381
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    FireEye Network Security, FireEye
    Learn More
    Overview

    Check Point’s evasion-resistant technology maximizes zero-day protection without compromising business productivity. For the first time, businesses can reduce the risk of unknown attacks by implementing a prevent-first approach. Learn More about Check Point Sandblast

    Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

    Sample Customers
    Edenred, State Transport Leasing Company (STLC), Edel AG, Laurenty, Conseil Départemental du Val de Marne, Koch Media
    FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Security Firm23%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Cloud Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government12%
    Security Firm10%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government9%
    University9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise28%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise55%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Check Point SandBlast Network is ranked 8th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 33 reviews while Trellix Network Detection and Response is ranked 9th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 35 reviews. Check Point SandBlast Network is rated 8.4, while Trellix Network Detection and Response is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point SandBlast Network writes "High detection with few false positives and able to handle large volumes of data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Network Detection and Response writes "Blocks traffic and DDoS attacks ". Check Point SandBlast Network is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Fortinet FortiSandbox, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Cisco Secure Network Analytics and Symantec Advanced Threat Protection, whereas Trellix Network Detection and Response is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Zscaler Internet Access, Fortinet FortiGate and NetWitness Platform. See our Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response report.

    See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

    We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.