Compare Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Kaspersky Sandbox

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, RSA, FireEye and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: May 2021.
510,882 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Choosing the correct set of licenses is essential because, without the additional software blade licenses, the Check Point gateways are just a stateful firewall.""I think the overall cost for introducing Check Point with SandBlast was reasonable and competitive in the market.""The cost is not significantly high and it can be negotiated during any purchase of NGFW."

More Check Point SandBlast Network Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection solutions are best for your needs.
510,882 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Preventing zero-day threats and extracting potential threats from incoming files with Threat Extraction is the most valuable feature for us.
Top Answer: I think the overall cost for introducing Check Point with SandBlast was reasonable and competitive in the market.
Top Answer: We have noticed a slight performance hit when the Threat Emulation and Extraction features were enabled, but the protection trade-off is worth it for us. If the performance could be improved in the… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
3,402
Comparisons
2,129
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
627
Rating
8.2
Views
140
Comparisons
95
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Check Point’s evasion-resistant technology maximizes zero-day protection without compromising business productivity. For the first time, businesses can reduce the risk of unknown attacks by implementing a prevent-first approach. Learn More about Check Point Sandblast

Today’s businesses need to combat the growing number and complexity of modern threats that bypass existing antivirus and EPP-class solutions, such as unknown malware, new viruses and ransomware, zero-day exploits and others. At the same time, there is a global shortage of skilled cybersecurity professionals, which can make it tough and expensive to hire them. Companies are looking for ways to automate the detection and response to advanced threats as much as possible. Kaspersky Sandbox harnesses our best expert practices in combating complex threats and APT-level attacks, providing advanced threat protection without the need for information security analysts.

Offer
Learn more about Check Point SandBlast Network
Learn more about Kaspersky Sandbox
Sample Customers
Edenred, State Transport Leasing Company (STLC), Edel AG, Laurenty, Conseil Départemental du Val de Marne, Koch Media
Ferrari S.P.A., Axel Springer, Telefonica
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Security Firm17%
Computer Software Company17%
Government8%
Individual & Family Service8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider23%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business41%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise36%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, RSA, FireEye and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: May 2021.
510,882 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Check Point SandBlast Network is ranked 5th in Advanced Threat Protection with 7 reviews while Kaspersky Sandbox is ranked 21st in Advanced Threat Protection. Check Point SandBlast Network is rated 8.2, while Kaspersky Sandbox is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Check Point SandBlast Network writes "Automatically cleans known file types, can detect local file changes, and offers Zero-day attack protection". On the other hand, Check Point SandBlast Network is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Fortinet FortiSandbox, FireEye Network Security, Proofpoint Email Protection and Symantec Advanced Threat Protection, whereas Kaspersky Sandbox is most compared with ESET Dynamic Threat Defense, Symantec Advanced Threat Protection and Fortinet FortiSandbox.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.