Compare Check Point SandBlast Network vs. McAfee Advanced Threat Defense

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point SandBlast Network vs. McAfee Advanced Threat Defense and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Check Point SandBlast Network Solution provides signature-based as well as zero-day threat protection. Also sandboxing can be performed on an on-premise device, cloud as well as the combination of both. Threat emulation is done on multiple OS & verdict is provided.""Threat Emulation gives networks the necessary protection against unknown threats in files that are attached to emails. The Threat Emulation engine picks up malware at the exploit phase before it enters the network. It quickly quarantines and runs the files in a virtual sandbox, which imitates a standard operating system, to discover malicious behavior before hackers can apply evasion techniques to bypass the sandbox.""When our workers are downloading software, SandBlast Cloud is useful to emulate the downloads that the workers are doing. Then, there are no threats coming into the company.""It provides a high rate of catching the zero-day advanced threats.""Threat extraction can help us to remove malicious content from documents by converting them to PDF.""Preventing zero-day threats and extracting potential threats from incoming files with Threat Extraction is the most valuable feature for us.""The sandbox is able to scan files without adding a delay or compromising productivity."

More Check Point SandBlast Network Pros »

"The most valuable features are the administration console and its detection and response module.""Its greatest strength is the DXL client which can rapidly disseminate attack information to all clients via the McAfee Agent instead of going through the ePO server."

More McAfee Advanced Threat Defense Pros »

Cons
"Many Important controls are only available in CLI & very very complicated. All tecli command features should available on GUI so that it will become easy for normal users to monitor & control queue.""I think Check Point provides standard time which ideally most other vendors take to identify behaviors of a file by sending them into a sandbox environment for inspection.""I would like if it could emulate bigger files and somehow improve this usability. I don't know if this would be possible. However, if it was able to scan or emulate bigger files, then it would be safer for a company using it.""The Threat Emulation software blade significantly affects the performance of the NGFWs, we have a significant increase in the CPU and memory consumption.""In Check Point SandBlast, improvement has to be made with respect to the GUI.""We have noticed a slight performance hit when the Threat Emulation and Extraction features were enabled, but the protection trade-off is worth it for us.""The file types that can be scanned are limited, which means that if the file type is not listed or enabled for the sandbox, they are bypassed and it can lead to a security issue."

More Check Point SandBlast Network Cons »

"I would like to see future versions of the solution incorporate artificial intelligence technology.""Make the ATD system a part of the whole product and take the whole thing onto the cloud. While it is there already, it is not to the same level as the on-premise version."

More McAfee Advanced Threat Defense Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Choosing the correct set of licenses is essential because, without the additional software blade licenses, the Check Point gateways are just a stateful firewall.""I think the overall cost for introducing Check Point with SandBlast was reasonable and competitive in the market.""The cost is not significantly high and it can be negotiated during any purchase of NGFW."

More Check Point SandBlast Network Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection solutions are best for your needs.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Preventing zero-day threats and extracting potential threats from incoming files with Threat Extraction is the most valuable feature for us.
Top Answer: I think the overall cost for introducing Check Point with SandBlast was reasonable and competitive in the market.
Top Answer: We have noticed a slight performance hit when the Threat Emulation and Extraction features were enabled, but the protection trade-off is worth it for us. If the performance could be improved in the… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
3,402
Comparisons
2,129
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
627
Rating
8.2
Views
604
Comparisons
306
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
297
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Check Point’s evasion-resistant technology maximizes zero-day protection without compromising business productivity. For the first time, businesses can reduce the risk of unknown attacks by implementing a prevent-first approach. Learn More about Check Point Sandblast

McAfee Advanced Threat Defense enables organizations to detect advanced, evasive malware and convert threat information into immediate action and protection. Unlike traditional sandboxes, it includes additional inspection capabilities that broaden detection and expose evasive threats. Tight integration between security solutions - from network and endpoint to investigation - enables instant sharing of threat information across the environment, enhancing protection and investigation. Flexible deployment options support every network.

Offer
Learn more about Check Point SandBlast Network
Learn more about McAfee Advanced Threat Defense
Sample Customers
Edenred, State Transport Leasing Company (STLC), Edel AG, Laurenty, Conseil Départemental du Val de Marne, Koch Media
The Radicati Group, Florida International University, MGM Resorts International, County Durham andDarlington NHS Foundation Trust
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Security Firm17%
Computer Software Company17%
Government8%
Individual & Family Service8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider23%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government7%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business41%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise36%
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise25%
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point SandBlast Network vs. McAfee Advanced Threat Defense and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Check Point SandBlast Network is ranked 5th in Advanced Threat Protection with 7 reviews while McAfee Advanced Threat Defense is ranked 14th in Advanced Threat Protection with 2 reviews. Check Point SandBlast Network is rated 8.2, while McAfee Advanced Threat Defense is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point SandBlast Network writes "Automatically cleans known file types, can detect local file changes, and offers Zero-day attack protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee Advanced Threat Defense writes "Can rapidly disseminate attack information to all clients". Check Point SandBlast Network is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Fortinet FortiSandbox, FireEye Network Security, Proofpoint Email Protection and Symantec Advanced Threat Protection, whereas McAfee Advanced Threat Defense is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox, FireEye Network Security, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection and Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection. See our Check Point SandBlast Network vs. McAfee Advanced Threat Defense report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.