Compare Check Point SandBlast Network vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point SandBlast Network vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Check Point SandBlast Network Solution provides signature-based as well as zero-day threat protection. Also sandboxing can be performed on an on-premise device, cloud as well as the combination of both. Threat emulation is done on multiple OS & verdict is provided.""Threat Emulation gives networks the necessary protection against unknown threats in files that are attached to emails. The Threat Emulation engine picks up malware at the exploit phase before it enters the network. It quickly quarantines and runs the files in a virtual sandbox, which imitates a standard operating system, to discover malicious behavior before hackers can apply evasion techniques to bypass the sandbox.""When our workers are downloading software, SandBlast Cloud is useful to emulate the downloads that the workers are doing. Then, there are no threats coming into the company.""It provides a high rate of catching the zero-day advanced threats.""Threat extraction can help us to remove malicious content from documents by converting them to PDF.""Preventing zero-day threats and extracting potential threats from incoming files with Threat Extraction is the most valuable feature for us.""The sandbox is able to scan files without adding a delay or compromising productivity."

More Check Point SandBlast Network Pros »

"I like this setup for a firewall. You can set things up very easily and you can automate items as well. It's a very robust firewall solution for enterprise as well as small businesses.""The stability of the solution is good. We haven't had any breaches or crashes. It's been very stable for us.""We get alert messages whenever there is a new threat. We are notified at the firewall level that things are blocked, which keeps us in our comfort zone.""The ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) on scanning is the most valuable feature.""Provides good protection and security.""It also has an easy configuration. The feedback that we get from our customers is that it's a good product."

More SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection Pros »

Cons
"Many Important controls are only available in CLI & very very complicated. All tecli command features should available on GUI so that it will become easy for normal users to monitor & control queue.""I think Check Point provides standard time which ideally most other vendors take to identify behaviors of a file by sending them into a sandbox environment for inspection.""I would like if it could emulate bigger files and somehow improve this usability. I don't know if this would be possible. However, if it was able to scan or emulate bigger files, then it would be safer for a company using it.""The Threat Emulation software blade significantly affects the performance of the NGFWs, we have a significant increase in the CPU and memory consumption.""In Check Point SandBlast, improvement has to be made with respect to the GUI.""We have noticed a slight performance hit when the Threat Emulation and Extraction features were enabled, but the protection trade-off is worth it for us.""The file types that can be scanned are limited, which means that if the file type is not listed or enabled for the sandbox, they are bypassed and it can lead to a security issue."

More Check Point SandBlast Network Cons »

"I would say the solution needs a much simpler user interface, but the functionality of the firewall is quite extensive. You need the user interface to be that way. However, if there was a way to make the user interface a little easier, that would be great.""If anything at all, it would be some very minor updates that need to be done, but in terms of changes, nothing comes to mind.""SonicWall should promote their roadmap and improve their marketing to customers.""We would like to get immediate alerts from the alerting system without using third-parties.""The setup needs improvement. It needs to be made more user-friendly.""Could provide online training to allow customers to learn more about the product.""I would like to have better documentation before starting with deployment because the deployment is a bit complex."

More SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Choosing the correct set of licenses is essential because, without the additional software blade licenses, the Check Point gateways are just a stateful firewall.""I think the overall cost for introducing Check Point with SandBlast was reasonable and competitive in the market.""The cost is not significantly high and it can be negotiated during any purchase of NGFW."

More Check Point SandBlast Network Pricing and Cost Advice »

"When you compare it with other solutions, they are cheaper and more economical.""We get our value for our money.""It's thirty dollars per user and we have 30 users."

More SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection solutions are best for your needs.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Preventing zero-day threats and extracting potential threats from incoming files with Threat Extraction is the most valuable feature for us.
Top Answer: I think the overall cost for introducing Check Point with SandBlast was reasonable and competitive in the market.
Top Answer: We have noticed a slight performance hit when the Threat Emulation and Extraction features were enabled, but the protection trade-off is worth it for us. If the performance could be improved in the… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
3,402
Comparisons
2,129
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
627
Rating
8.2
Views
1,496
Comparisons
726
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
328
Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Check Point’s evasion-resistant technology maximizes zero-day protection without compromising business productivity. For the first time, businesses can reduce the risk of unknown attacks by implementing a prevent-first approach. Learn More about Check Point Sandblast

SonicWall Capture, a cloud based service available with SonicWall firewalls, revolutionizes advanced threat detection and sandboxing with a multi-engine approach to stopping unknown and zero-day attacks at the gateway, and with automated remediation. Customers benefit from high security effectiveness, fast response times and reduced total cost of ownership.

Offer
Learn more about Check Point SandBlast Network
Learn more about SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection
Sample Customers
Edenred, State Transport Leasing Company (STLC), Edel AG, Laurenty, Conseil Départemental du Val de Marne, Koch Media
Wonder Cement, Foster Clark Products
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Security Firm17%
Computer Software Company17%
Government8%
Individual & Family Service8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider22%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider11%
Manufacturing Company7%
University6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business41%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise36%
REVIEWERS
Small Business71%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point SandBlast Network vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Check Point SandBlast Network is ranked 5th in Advanced Threat Protection with 7 reviews while SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection is ranked 8th in Advanced Threat Protection with 6 reviews. Check Point SandBlast Network is rated 8.2, while SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Check Point SandBlast Network writes "Automatically cleans known file types, can detect local file changes, and offers Zero-day attack protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection writes "Protects against zero-day threats and has good automation options". Check Point SandBlast Network is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Fortinet FortiSandbox, FireEye Network Security, Proofpoint Email Protection and Symantec Advanced Threat Protection, whereas SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Fortinet FortiSandbox, Symantec Advanced Threat Protection, FireEye Network Security and Microsoft Defender for Office 365. See our Check Point SandBlast Network vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.