• Home
  • Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Zscaler Cloud Sandbox [EOL]

Check Point SandBlast Network vs Zscaler Cloud Sandbox [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point SandBlast Network and Zscaler Cloud Sandbox [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP).
To learn more, read our detailed Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Edwin Solano Salmeron
Helps detect and understand vulnerabilities with good advanced protection
The product gives us advanced protection, including artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies and services. It is managing to... Read more →
Use Zscaler Cloud Sandbox [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We have seen ROI."
  • "We would like to try the Threat Extraction blade, but you need to buy a license. Check Point is expensive. I would like to buy things, but I would need the funding."
  • "Choosing the correct set of licenses is essential because, without the additional software blade licenses, the Check Point gateways are just a stateful firewall."
  • "I think the overall cost for introducing Check Point with SandBlast was reasonable and competitive in the market."
  • "The cost is not significantly high and it can be negotiated during any purchase of NGFW."
  • "The cost of Check Point SandBlast Network is annually, and there is only a standard license."
  • "The pricing is quite effective, not excessively high. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest price, I rate the pricing a nine."

    • More Check Point SandBlast Network Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Check Point SandBlast Network?
    Top Answer:The solution can detect and prevent attacks that may be encrypted.
    Read all 20 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point SandB...
    Top Answer:The cost and licensing will always be expensive. That said, we opted for this tool and removed two others, so we felt we achieved a good amount of savings.
    Read all 13 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Check Point SandBlast Network?
    Top Answer:The configuration could be optimized. The usability could improve. They need to make the guides more specific with images, as it is very complicated to guess where each option is located. The… more »
    Read all 19 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    8th
    out of 37 in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
    Views
    1,868
    Comparisons
    1,162
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    452
    Rating
    8.3
    Unranked
    In Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Check Point Software Technologies
    Zscaler
    Overview

    Check Point’s evasion-resistant technology maximizes zero-day protection without compromising business productivity. For the first time, businesses can reduce the risk of unknown attacks by implementing a prevent-first approach. Learn More about Check Point Sandblast

    Today’s appliance-based sandboxing solutions are expensive and, therefore, typically installed only in the data center. When users leave the network, they become exposed to new threats because sandbox protection can’t follow them. Traditional sandboxes usually operate out of line, allowing traffic through while inspecting suspicious files in TAP mode. If a threat is detected in the sandbox, it sends alerts, but they can arrive too late. Traditional sandboxes also lack the ability to fully inspect SSL traffic due to hardware limitations—and many malware authors are exploiting those limitations to distribute their malicious payloads. In order to provide sandbox protection, organizations have bolted sandboxing solutions onto their existing security stacks. It helps, but achieving a fully integrated threat platform across multiple products is nearly impossible.

    For more details: https://www.zscaler.com/produc...

    Sample Customers
    Edenred, State Transport Leasing Company (STLC), Edel AG, Laurenty, Conseil Départemental du Val de Marne, Koch Media
    Zenith Live, Azure, Carlsberg Group
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Security Firm23%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Cloud Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government12%
    Security Firm9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise28%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise54%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Check Point SandBlast Network is ranked 8th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 33 reviews while Zscaler Cloud Sandbox [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Check Point SandBlast Network is rated 8.4, while Zscaler Cloud Sandbox [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Check Point SandBlast Network writes "High detection with few false positives and able to handle large volumes of data". On the other hand, Check Point SandBlast Network is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Fortinet FortiSandbox, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Cisco Secure Network Analytics and Trellix Network Detection and Response, whereas Zscaler Cloud Sandbox [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

    We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.