We performed a comparison between Check Point Security Management and Logsign Next-Gen SIEM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The firewall's blades are the solution's most valuable feature."
"The firewall cleverly handles such attacks without compromising on performance."
"Check Point Security Management has a great feature that allows you to automate the request of the automated server."
"The Check Point Management server is isolated from security gateways, which means that in case there is an issue, we have our configuration ready and we can directly replace the device and push the configuration."
"The compliance is great."
"The solution is ideal for use and deployment in a large infrastructure environment."
"We love the ability to monitor performance in real-time, and gather critical information about network flows and traffic."
"The rulebase management and the shared layers concept is implemented well."
"Logsign provides sample logs within the product, allowing users to see how logs will appear before integration, which is a valuable feature for testing and understanding log formats."
"The reporting should be improved in future releases. It needs to be very explicit. This is very important."
"Installing a policy takes a very long time to complete."
"I would like this solution to be integrated directly into the Cluster XL equipment."
"Being a security appliance, there should be the ability for the Security Management server to send email alerts via authenticated email."
"For those not familiar with the Command Line interface, there should be an option in the GUI for operating backups."
"I like that the Compliance software blade is available for free with the Security Management server purchase, but it is free for only one year - after that you have to buy an additional license to continue using it. I think such an important feature is vital for the management server, and should not be licensed separately."
"SD-WAN functionality could be added."
"Some costs are ridiculously high."
"I hope they address the pricing model for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM, especially regarding regional variations. The pricing should not differ based on the country of operation as it can lead to dissatisfaction among customers. A fixed pricing structure would be more favorable for us. I would also suggest enhancing the GUI interface and adding features similar to xFi Exchange from IBM Pure. This would streamline operations and save time for analysts."
More Check Point Security Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Security Management is ranked 9th in Log Management with 55 reviews while Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is ranked 44th in Log Management with 2 reviews. Check Point Security Management is rated 8.8, while Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Security Management writes "Great DDoS protection, high availability, and useful firewall rule implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Logsign Next-Gen SIEM writes "Easy to use and find the features that you need". Check Point Security Management is most compared with Wazuh, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, IBM Security QRadar, LogRhythm SIEM and Splunk Cloud Platform, whereas Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is most compared with Grafana Loki, Wazuh, IBM Security QRadar, ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer and Splunk Enterprise Security. See our Check Point Security Management vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.