Most Helpful Review
Enables us to monitor what comes over to our network and we can then check the dashboard and work accordingly
Configuring the network was the easiest part of implementation, but the internet failover needs to work better.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
The most valuable feature is the monitoring. We can easily monitor what kind of stuff comes over to our network and we can then check the dashboard and work accordingly.
We consolidated from three management consoles and three clusters to only one, which is a big improvement.
Its blades and VSLS (Virtual System Load Sharing) work fine.
Monitoring using SmartConsole and all its features is extremely easy, and I find SmartEvent an excellent monitoring tool for spotting threats and user behaviour.
The multiple virtual firewalls on one box are extremely useful and the interconnection with virtual switches is simple and easy to understand.
The most valuable feature is the IPS. It also protects us from malware.
UTM 9 brings along IPSec as well as iPhone and iPad support. This seems small but it’s useful.
The isolation of infected machines is a big feature. Also, the ability to detect external sources that change files on a file server is really big.
It improved bandwidth utilization and provided link load balancing features for internet and intranet lease lines.
Advanced protection (Sophos Sandstorm) - Protects against crypto viruses in real-time.
It has helped by identifying threats within the company. If there are computers or servers that are compromised, then we are able to identify them right away in the system.
The implementation with the AWS environment was good.
It meets our compliance needs in an elastic computer environment.
The initial setup was a bit complex.
Having a web UI in the VSX (or something similar) would be nice.
We have Microsoft CASB cloud app security and it's one of the least compatible firewalls. They really need to look at this, as both Check Point and Microsoft are major players. Why aren't they compatible? If we had Palo Alto then we wouldn't have this problem.
The solution could be improved by adding cloud soundboxing.
We didn’t find any issues but I know there have been some in the last few years.
It does have built-in policies, which enable you to disable USB devices, etc. It would be nice if they had more policies because there are not that many of them.
Initially, there were issues with the wireless network as wireless access points were disappearing from the dashboard after some time.
There is still room for improvement in wireless protection. I don't mean their WiFi device is bad, but there are still things to improve on, such as WiFi roaming.
The technical support only communicates via email. I would prefer to communicate directly with someone.
They could reduce the price.
It is a little too CPU resource intensive, so we would like to see improvements there.
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The biggest issue with Sophos is the pricing. It's definitely more expensive. As I said, we looked at Webroot, which is a big alternative, and Sophos was almost three times the price of Webroot. That's a pretty big difference.
We purchased the appliance with five years onsite support and licenses.
Pricing for the upgrade was very competitive as Sophos wanted to retain existing customers.
Sometimes more is less, meaning if you want more than three features, take the FullGuard licence.
The pricing and licensing are both good and better than Sophos's competitors. This is why we went with the product.
The AWS Marketplace product should be a better fit, but it is a little pricier.
Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace is pretty straightforward. Because were entirely on AWS and don't have anything anywhere else. It made the most sense for us as a one stop shop.
The pricing is pretty reasonable. I don't think that it is overly expensive.
out of 48 in Firewalls
out of 48 in Firewalls
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
|VSX (Virtual System Extension) is a security and VPN solution for large-scale environments based on the proven security of Check Point Security Gateway. VSX provides comprehensive protection for multiple networks or VLANs within complex infrastructures. It securely connects them to shared resources such as the Internet and/or a DMZ, and allows them to safely interact with each other.||The global network of highly skilled researchers and analysts, protecting businesses from known and emerging malware - viruses, rootkits and spyware.|
Learn more about Check Point VSX
Learn more about Sophos UTM
|Bentley Systems, Almaviva TSF S.p.A, Yankuang Group, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.||One Housing Group|
No Data Available
Financial Services Firm12%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm6%