Most Helpful Review
Use PT Application Firewall? Share your opinion.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.
They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.
Veracode has been fair. We use their SaaS solution and it's just an annual subscription.
No issues, the pricing seems reasonable.
It is pricey. There is a lot of value in the product, but it is a costly tool.
I recommend going for a one-year licensing with CA, because currently they are the leaders in this field with more features and a much better turn around time with a cheaper position, but there are a lot of new companies coming up in the market and they are building up their platforms.
Costs are reasonable. No special infrastructure is required and the license model is good.
I think the pricing is in line with the rest of the tools. I think you get what you pay for. It is certainly not inexpensive, but the value proposition is there. There are certainly cheaper tools, but I don't think we'd be getting the support that we get with those, and that is what separates this product from the others.
We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution.
It is an expensive solution.
Be cautious of the one-year subscription date. Once it expires, your price will go up.
We got a special offer for a 30% reduction for three years, after our first year. I think for a real source-code scanning tool, you have to add a lot of money for Open Source Analysis, and AppSec Coach (160 Euro per user per year).
Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications).
Information Not Available
Compared 49% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 41% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 85% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Veracode is an application security company that offers an automated cloud-based service for securing web, mobile and third-party enterprise applications. Veracode provides multiple security analysis technologies on a single platform, including static analysis, dynamic analysis, mobile application behavioral analysis and software composition analysis.
Checkmarx CxSAST is a highly accurate and flexible Static Code Analysis product that allows organizations to automatically scan un-compiled / un-built code and identify hundreds of security vulnerabilities in all major coding languages. CxSAST is available as a standalone product and can be effectively integrated into the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) to streamline detection and remediation. CxSAST can be deployed on-premise in a private data center or hosted via a public cloud.
The application security experts at Positive Technologies have spent over a decade analyzing thousands of unique network, Web, mobile, ERP and ICS/SCADA applications, discovering more than 150 zero-day vulnerabilities each year and securing the IT networks of leading banks, global telecommunications providers and industrial conglomerates. Positive Technologies is helping companies like yours meet their application security challenges head-on with:
Keep your software secure
Application security starts with secure code. Find out more about the benefits of using Veracode to keep your software secure throughout the development lifecycle.
Learn more about Checkmarx
Learn more about PT Application Firewall
|State of Missouri, Rekner||YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC||Sberbank NPF, Svyaznoy, MegaFon, Ural Federal University, VGTRK|
Financial Services Firm33%
Software R&D Company39%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm8%
Financial Services Firm57%
Software R&D Company14%
Comms Service Provider14%
Software R&D Company32%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider12%
No Data Available
No Data Available