We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Sonatype Repository Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Scan reviews can occur during the development lifecycle."
"The product's most valuable feature is static code and supply chain effect analysis. It provides a lot of visibility."
"Vulnerability details is valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the simple user interface."
"The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things. It also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."
"The administration in Checkmarx is very good."
"Less false positive errors as compared to any other solution."
"Our static operation security has been able to identify more security issues since implementing this solution."
"Another thing that I like about Sonatype is that if you download something today, and five days from today it becomes vulnerable, it will notify you."
"The product's network and intrusion protection features are valuable. It also has rules and compliance features for security."
"Meta data is always needed."
"It would be really helpful if the level of confidence was included, with respect to identified issues."
"The solution sometimes reports a false auditable code or false positive."
"Checkmarx reports many false positives that we need to manually segregate and mark “Not exploitable”."
"We would like to be able to run scans from our local system, rather than having to always connect to the product server, which is a longer process."
"The interactive application security testing, or IAST, the interactive part where you're looking at an application that lives in a runtime environment on a server or virtual machine, needs improvement."
"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."
"The statistics module has a function that allows you to show some statistics, but I think it's limited. Maybe it needs more information."
"The tool needs to improve its file systems. The product should also include zero test feature."
"What I don't like is the lack of an option to pick up the phone and call someone for support. That is something they need to improve on. They need to have a professional services package, or they need to include that option with their services."
Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews while Sonatype Repository Firewall is ranked 31st in Application Security Tools with 3 reviews. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Sonatype Repository Firewall is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sonatype Repository Firewall writes "You will get clean code every time, and that's a great achievement". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Sonatype Repository Firewall is most compared with JFrog Xray, Cisco Secure Firewall, GitHub, Black Duck and Snyk. See our Checkmarx One vs. Sonatype Repository Firewall report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
