We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Fortra Tripwire IP360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."Most valuable features include: ease of use, dashboard. interface and the ability to report."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are difficult to pinpoint because of the way the functionalities and the features are intertwined, it's difficult to say which part of them I prefer most. You initiate the scan, you have a scan, you have the review set, and reporting, they all work together as one whole process. It's not like accounting software, where you have the different features, et cetera."
"It shows in-depth code of where actual vulnerabilities are."
"Less false positive errors as compared to any other solution."
"Vulnerability details is valuable."
"The solution communicates where to fix the issue for the purpose of less iterations."
"The administration in Checkmarx is very good."
"The UI is very intuitive and simple to use."
"Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."
"It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed."
"We could manage our entire IP range with the solution."
"Some of the descriptions were found to be missing or were not as elaborate as compared to other descriptions. Although, they could be found across various standard sources but it would save a lot of time for developers, if this was fixed."
"Checkmarx could improve the solution reports and false positives. The false positives could be reduced. For example, we have alerts that are tagged as vulnerabilities but when you drill down they are not."
"Micro-services need to be included in the next release."
"Its pricing model can be improved. Sometimes, it is a little complex to understand its pricing model."
"Its user interface could be improved and made more friendly."
"Checkmarx has a slightly difficult compilation with the CI/CD pipeline."
"We have received some feedback from our customers who are receiving a large number of false positives."
"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."
"We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running."
"The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side."
"I am not very impressed by the technical support."
Checkmarx One doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Vulnerability Management with 67 reviews while Fortra Tripwire IP360 is ranked 37th in Vulnerability Management with 6 reviews. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Fortra Tripwire IP360 is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortra Tripwire IP360 writes "The solution helps users to manage their entire IP range, but it's unreliable and very expensive to maintain". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Fortra Tripwire IP360 is most compared with Tenable Nessus.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
