Checkmarx vs. Tripwire IP360

As of June 2019, Checkmarx is ranked 4th in Application Security with 10 reviews vs Tripwire IP360 which is ranked 9th in Vulnerability Management with 2 reviews. The top reviewer of Checkmarx writes "Works well with Windows servers but no Linux support and takes too long to scan files". The top reviewer of Tripwire IP360 writes "A mature and evolving solution that has become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network". Checkmarx is most compared with SonarQube, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand and Veracode. Tripwire IP360 is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys Web Application Scanning and Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Checkmarx Logo
50,948 views|20,759 comparisons
Tripwire IP360 Logo
1,872 views|468 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, SonarQube, Micro Focus and others in Application Security. Updated: May 2019.
348,558 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Overall, the ability to find vulnerabilities in the code is better than the tool that we were using before.Our static operation security has been able to identify more security issues since implementing this solution.The main benefit to using this solution is that we find vulnerabilities in our software before the development cycle is complete.The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the Best Fix Location and the Payments option because you can save a lot of time trying to mitigate the configuration. Using these tools can save you a lot of time.It is a stable product.Most valuable features include: ease of use, dashboard. interface and the ability to report.It shows in-depth code of where actual vulnerabilities are.It gives the proper code flow of vulnerabilities and the number of occurrences.

Read more »

It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed.

Read more »

Cons
Checkmarx being Windows only is a hindrance. Another problem is: why can't I choose PostgreSQL?It would be really helpful if the level of confidence was included, with respect to identified issues.The reports are good, but they still need to be improved considering what the UI offers.With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too.It is an expensive solution.It provides us with quite a handful of false positive issues. If Checkmarx could reduce this number, it would be a great tool to use.I think the CxAudit tool has room for improvement. At the beginning you can choose a scan of a project, but in any event the project must be scanned again (wasting time).Updating and debugging of queries is not very convenient.

Read more »

The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution.It is an expensive solution.Be cautious of the one-year subscription date. Once it expires, your price will go up.We got a special offer for a 30% reduction for three years, after our first year. I think for a real source-code scanning tool, you have to add a lot of money for Open Source Analysis, and AppSec Coach (160 Euro per user per year).Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications).

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
348,558 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
Views
50,948
Comparisons
20,759
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
422
Avg. Rating
8.1
9th
Views
1,872
Comparisons
468
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
529
Avg. Rating
6.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 42% of the time.
Also Known As
IP360
Learn
Checkmarx
Tripwire
Overview

Checkmarx CxSAST is a highly accurate and flexible Static Code Analysis product that allows organizations to automatically scan un-compiled / un-built code and identify hundreds of security vulnerabilities in all major coding languages. CxSAST is available as a standalone product and can be effectively integrated into the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) to streamline detection and remediation. CxSAST can be deployed on-premise in a private data center or hosted via a public cloud.

Whitepaper: I, II

Tripwire IP360 delivers risk-based vulnerability assessment and asset discovery capabilities. With IP360, you get:

  • Comprehensive discovery and profiling of all network assets.
  • Highly scalable architecture with low network impact.
  • Advanced vulnerability scoring that identifies top risks.
  • Prioritized change results when used with Tripwire Enterprise.
Offer
Learn more about Checkmarx
Learn more about Tripwire IP360
Sample Customers
YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLCState of Iowa, State of Minnesota, U.S. Cellular
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm57%
Engineering Company14%
Comms Service Provider14%
Software R&D Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm26%
Manufacturing Company14%
Government9%
Software R&D Company7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise3%
Large Enterprise77%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, SonarQube, Micro Focus and others in Application Security. Updated: May 2019.
348,558 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email