We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has all the features we need."
"The SAST component was absolutely 100% stable."
"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."
"Overall, the ability to find vulnerabilities in the code is better than the tool that we were using before."
"The administration in Checkmarx is very good."
"The report function is the solution's greatest asset."
"The setup is fairly easy. We didn't struggle with the process at all."
"Vulnerability details is valuable."
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"The product can be improved by continuing to expand the application languages and frameworks that can be scanned for vulnerabilities. This includes expanded coverage for mobile applications as well as open-source development tools."
"The solution's user interface could be improved because it seems outdated."
"As the solution becomes more complex and feature rich, it takes more time to debug and resolve problems. Feature-wise, we have no complaints, but Checkmarx becomes harder to maintain as the product becomes more complex. When I talk to support, it takes them longer to fix the problem than it used to."
"We have received some feedback from our customers who are receiving a large number of false positives."
"Checkmarx needs to be more scalable for large enterprise companies."
"Implementing a blackout time for any user or teams: Needs improvement."
"The reports are good, but they still need to be improved considering what the UI offers."
"It would be really helpful if the level of confidence was included, with respect to identified issues."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
Earn 20 points
Checkmarx One doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in API Security with 67 reviews while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 7th in API Security. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare. See our Checkmarx One vs. Wallarm NG WAF report.
See our list of best API Security vendors.
We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.