We performed a comparison between Checkmarx and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's not an obstacle for developers. They can easily write their code and make it more secure with Checkmarx."
"Vulnerability details is valuable."
"Our static operation security has been able to identify more security issues since implementing this solution."
"Less false positive errors as compared to any other solution."
"The solution communicates where to fix the issue for the purpose of less iterations."
"The value you can get out of the speedy production may be worth the price tag."
"One of the most valuable features is it is flexible."
"Both automatic and manual code review (CxQL) are valuable."
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"The product's reporting feature could be better. The feature works well for developers, but reports generated to be shared with external parties are poor, it lacks the details one gets when viewing the results directly from the Checkmarx One platform."
"Its user interface could be improved and made more friendly."
"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."
"Checkmarx needs to improve the false positives and provide more accuracy in identifying vulnerabilities. It misses important vulnerabilities."
"Implementing a blackout time for any user or teams: Needs improvement."
"The solution's user interface could be improved because it seems outdated."
"There is nothing particular that I don't like in this solution. It can have more integrations, but the integrations that we would like are in the roadmap anyway, and they just need to deliver the roadmap. What I like about the roadmap is that it is going where it needs to go. If I were to look at the roadmap, there is nothing that is jumping out there that says to me, "Yeah. I'd like something else on the roadmap." What they're looking to deliver is what I would expect and forecast them to deliver."
"The statistics module has a function that allows you to show some statistics, but I think it's limited. Maybe it needs more information."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
Earn 20 points
Checkmarx is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 29th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Checkmarx is rated 7.6, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Checkmarx writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". Checkmarx is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare. See our Checkmarx vs. Wallarm NG WAF report.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.