Compare Cherwell Service Management vs. ServiceNow
Cherwell Service Management is ranked 16th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 2 reviews while ServiceNow is ranked 1st in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 21 reviews. Cherwell Service Management is rated 6.6, while ServiceNow is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cherwell Service Management writes "Good dashboard and reporting functionality, but overall not very user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow writes "Discovery has reduced the time to build/deploy devices within our environment". Cherwell Service Management is most compared with ServiceNow, BMC Helix ITSM and JIRA Service Desk, whereas ServiceNow is most compared with BMC Helix ITSM, Appian and JIRA Service Desk.
Most Helpful Review | |
 Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, ManageEngine and others in IT Service Management (ITSM). Updated: January 2020. 397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
The dashboard and the reporting functionality are the solution's most valuable features. Clear processes with transparent responsibilities led to more efficiencies within the teams. The dashboard is very useful to get a quick overview of current tasks. | The most valuable feature is that this is a Cloud solution. This solution is a single-storage for our user community to submit help desk tickets. Easy to integrate with third-party applications. In the Service Portal, the widget concept - and the way we have developed our widget - is pretty simple. We can leverage a lot on top of it. HR Case Management and Customer Service Management are two of the key areas which clients are using. Discovery has reduced, on average, the time to build/deploy devices within our environment by one hour. This may not seem like much but it adds up over time. It also reaps additional time savings with its ability to capture changes through subsequent discoveries over the life of the device. I have found many features that are important and that are easier when compared to Remedy; for example, the Scripted REST APIs and the Flow Designer... The Client scripts are simpler when you compare with Remedy. Creating a ticket is much simpler in this tool. That is one big advantage. Also, the simplicity and ease of use are much better. I've used HPSM and it is very complex in comparison to ServiceNow. |
Cons | |
The stability, specifically in the on-premises deployment model, could be improved. | Transparency in the pricing model needs to be improved. I do not like the user interface. It's missing monitoring capabilities. For healthcare, which is a pretty audited environment, there are no concrete solutions for digital signatures, apart from our license with Adobe, so it requires orchestration. HR Service Management is one module that needs a lot of improvement because it's a pretty new module. It was introduced in the last two years. It's becoming more mature day by day, but there is a lot of scope for improvement in that module. Where it could be improved is Discovery. This may sound odd since I just praised the value of ServiceNow Discovery, but improvements to its automatic detection, the breadth of devices, and the depth of devices covered, as well as keeping up with new technologies, are all essential. The standard UI is very restricted. It doesn't look as good, compared to Remedy. Building your own UI requires some additional coding... When it comes to reference fields, there are some limitations where you aren't able to use them, like in relationship queries. In Remedy, when you click a menu, you get options directly, whereas here, if you use a reference field, it points you to a different form. So the UI experience totally changes for the end user. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | The license model is based on a number of fulfillers (active users who play some role within the ServiceNow functionality). Therefore, you can serve as many end-users as you want, without additional costs. Initially, the licensing model ServiceNow came up with was very good. But now, from a licensing perspective, they are changing their model day by day. It is becoming a bit expensive for customers. Isn't pricing always too much? We really do chafe at the ITIL licensing. ITOM is also pretty expensive. ServiceNow is a leader and its pricing is quite good, quite competitive... Sometimes some plugins are not priced reasonably but, generally, the platform itself, its modules, are priced reasonably. ServiceNow pricing is an art, not a science. The deal depends on how commercially savvy you are, which does make it something that is quite difficult to get right. It is most definitely an opportunity area for ServiceNow to improve and have more visibility around pricing of the different products within the platform. It's sold as a less expensive solution, but it has to be highly modified. That's where you get into the cost. We know that ServiceNow is not cheap, it's more expensive than other solutions. But we are trying to increase our ability to handle tickets so that the cost per ticket is less. It has a higher cost compared to local/regional solutions. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs. 397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 2,467 Comparisons 1,958 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 262 Avg. Rating 6.5 | Views 50,289 Comparisons 29,967 Reviews 21 Average Words per Review 599 Avg. Rating 8.4 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 64% of the time.  Compared 11% of the time.  Compared 5% of the time. | Compared 21% of the time.  Compared 5% of the time. Compared 5% of the time. |
Learn | |
| Cherwell Software | ServiceNow |
Overview | |
| Cherwell Service Management is a powerful IT service management (ITSM) solution that provides IT organizations the flexibility needed for rapid configuration and customization, minimal overhead, and frictionless upgrades at a fraction of the cost and complexity associated with legacy ITSM solutions. Cherwell's codeless design architecture means you can add new functionality without modifying a single line of code, integrate easily with third party applications, and upgrade without fear of breaking what you've built. | Now, with the ServiceNow System of Action, every employee, customer, and machine can make requests on a single cloud platform. Every department working on tasks can assign and prioritize, collaborate, get down to root cause issues, gain real-time insights, and drive to action. Your employees are energized, your service levels improve, and you realize game-changing economics. Work at lightspeed.(TM) |
Offer | |
Learn more about Cherwell Service Management | Learn more about ServiceNow |
Sample Customers | |
| Ausenco, Highlights for Children, B/E Aerospace | AAA, AstraZeneca, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Broadcom, Christus Health, Epicor, Equinix, GE Capital, Intuit, KPMG, Loyola Marymount University, OshKosh, Quantas, RedHat, Royal Bank of Scotland, Swiss Re, U.S. Department of Energy, Safeway, Yale University, and Zillow |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Healthcare Company14% Financial Services Firm14% Insurance Company10% University9% Software R&D Company35% Comms Service Provider11% Government7% Manufacturing Company6% |
Company Size | |
No Data Available | Small Business15% Midsize Enterprise13% Large Enterprise72% Small Business20% Midsize Enterprise9% Large Enterprise72% |
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, ManageEngine and others in IT Service Management (ITSM). Updated: January 2020.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also Cherwell Service Management Reviews, ServiceNow Reviews, and our list of Best IT Service Management (ITSM) Companies.
We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.