CircleCI vs. TeamCity

As of June 2019, CircleCI is ranked 5th in Build Automation with 1 review vs TeamCity which is ranked 3rd in Build Automation with 6 reviews. The top reviewer of CircleCI writes "Seamless build process automation has increased our product velocity significantly". The top reviewer of TeamCity writes "The flexibility of the product allows it to support a seemingly infinite number of build workflows". CircleCI is most compared with Jenkins, Travis CI and GitLab. TeamCity is most compared with Jenkins, GitLab and Bamboo.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CircleCI Logo
4,191 views|2,163 comparisons
TeamCity Logo
27,839 views|6,151 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins, CloudBees, JetBrains and others in Build Automation. Updated: June 2019.
346,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The ability to automate the build process in a seamless way and run workflows effortlessly. It supports parallel builds so it can scale well. Also, it covers the basics of any build and integration tool, including email notifications (especially when tests are fixed), project insights, etc.Enables us to detect exactly which build failed and why, and to push multiple builds to our production environment at a very fast rate.Some of the most valuable features include container-based builds, integration with Bit Bucket and being able to store artifacts.

Read more »

I have not yet implemented the remote build feature, but this will be a big plus. We want to be able to build legacy products on a build agent without developers needing to have obsolete tool sets installed on their local PC.The flexibility of TeamCity allows it to fit in workflows that I have yet to imagine.It provides repeatable CI/CD throughout our company with lots of feedback on failures and successes to the intended audiences via email and Slack.Using TeamCity and emailing everyone on fail is one way to emphasize the importance of testing code and showing management why taking the time to test actually does saves time from having to fix bugs on the other end.It's easy to move to a new release because of templates and meta-runners, and agent pooling.VCS Trigger: Provides excellent source control support.Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products.

Read more »

Cons
Integration with Microsoft Azure is one area for improvement. Azure is growing in its user base, and supports various cloud infrastructure components such as Service Fabric, App Service, etc. Some of Azure’s deployment models (like Kudu) require a steep learning curve, but if CircleCI would come up with such features (deployment to App Service) out of the box, it would be amazing.

Read more »

Their online documentation is fairly extensive, but sometimes you can end up navigating in circles to find answers. I would like them (or partner with someone)​ to provide training classes to help newcomers get things up and running more quickly.It will benefit this solution if they keep up to date with other CI/CD systems out there.Last time I used it, dotnet compilation had to be done via PowerShell scripts. There was actually a lot that had to be scripted.REST API support lacks many features in customization of builds, jobs, and settings.The upgrade process could be smoother. Upgrading major versions can often cause some pain.I would suggest creating simple and advanced configurations. Advanced configurations will give more customizations like Jenkins does.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Start with the free tier for a few build configs and see how it works for you, then according to your scale find the enterprise license which fits you the most.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
346,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
5th
out of 23 in Build Automation
Views
4,191
Comparisons
2,163
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
628
Avg. Rating
9.0
3rd
out of 23 in Build Automation
Views
27,839
Comparisons
6,151
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
265
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 49% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Learn
CircleCI
JetBrains
Overview
CircleCI's continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. CircleCI offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp quickly, scale easily, and build confidently every day.

TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

Offer
Learn more about CircleCI
Learn more about TeamCity
Sample Customers
Shopify, Zenefits, Concur Technologies, CyberAgentToyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia
Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins, CloudBees, JetBrains and others in Build Automation. Updated: June 2019.
346,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email