Anonymous UserDirector of Network and Security at a tech services company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"This is an expensive solution."
"I don't believe there is any licensing required."
"Once you sign for the start kit implementation, you have to go all the way through to the implementation, even if you are experiences issues."
Earn 20 points
Providing end-users with the best low-latency experience, Mercury excels at deploying virtualized network functions at the mobile edge, at the customer premises, and in the network as an edge cloud. Mercury NFV platforms ensure that your network is always ready to respond quickly to new customer service opportunities.
Cisco ACI is ranked 2nd in Network Virtualization with 23 reviews while ECI Mercury is ranked 7th in Network Virtualization. Cisco ACI is rated 8.0, while ECI Mercury is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco ACI writes "Our clients can implement one tool and have a unified visual picture of the health of the network". On the other hand, Cisco ACI is most compared with VMware NSX, Nuage Networks, Cisco Elastic Services Controller and Sangfor aBOS, whereas ECI Mercury is most compared with .
See our list of best Network Virtualization vendors.
We monitor all Network Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.