Compare Cisco ACI vs. ECI Mercury

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco ACI Logo
13,543 views|7,651 comparisons
ECI Mercury Logo
66 views|45 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Cisco, Masergy and others in Network Virtualization. Updated: April 2021.
479,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This is an expensive solution.""I don't believe there is any licensing required.""Once you sign for the start kit implementation, you have to go all the way through to the implementation, even if you are experiences issues."

More Cisco ACI Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
479,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Cisco's technical support team is very good.
Top Answer: I don't believe there is any licensing required.
Top Answer: From my point of view, troubleshooting issues relating to ACI can be a little bit complicated to perform.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
2nd
Views
13,543
Comparisons
7,651
Reviews
23
Average Words per Review
525
Rating
7.9
7th
Views
66
Comparisons
45
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
ECI Mercury NFV, ECI Mercury Network Functions Virtualization
Learn More
Overview
Cisco Application-Centric Infrastructure (ACI) reduces TCO, automates IT tasks, and accelerates data center application deployments. It accomplishes this using a business-relevant Software Defined Networking (SDN) policy model across networks, servers, storage, security, and services.

Providing end-users with the best low-latency experience, Mercury excels at deploying virtualized network functions at the mobile edge, at the customer premises, and in the network as an edge cloud. Mercury NFV platforms ensure that your network is always ready to respond quickly to new customer service opportunities.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco ACI
Learn more about ECI Mercury
Sample Customers
Bowling Green State University, du, Qatar University
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm18%
Government10%
Media Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider38%
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm5%
Government5%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise73%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Cisco, Masergy and others in Network Virtualization. Updated: April 2021.
479,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco ACI is ranked 2nd in Network Virtualization with 23 reviews while ECI Mercury is ranked 7th in Network Virtualization. Cisco ACI is rated 8.0, while ECI Mercury is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco ACI writes "Our clients can implement one tool and have a unified visual picture of the health of the network". On the other hand, Cisco ACI is most compared with VMware NSX, Nuage Networks, Cisco Elastic Services Controller and Sangfor aBOS, whereas ECI Mercury is most compared with .

See our list of best Network Virtualization vendors.

We monitor all Network Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.