Compare Cisco AMP for Endpoints vs. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco AMP for Endpoints vs. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers.""I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help.""For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.""The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.""The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.""The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.""I am really satisfied with the technical support.""It is a very stable program."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pros »

"If you open up an application or a web browser, it puts a container in a sandbox area. So if there's some malicious code, it'll stick there. It also has way better protection for ransomware because it uses heuristics that are pretty effective. We've done a lot of tests with live malware, and it works really well.""The most valuable feature is the management of end-user machines."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Pros »

Cons
"We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released.""I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails.""The solution needs more in-depth analytics.""In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.""The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.""In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.""The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.""I would like more seamless integration."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Cons »

"Would be good to have a better understanding of what it is that you've got in quarantine.""Their support is not very good because they are very late to reply."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price of this product should be lower."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.
Top Answer: Nice to have URL management, password protection of the app, more details of the machine & user running the app.
Top Answer: The primary use case is for endpoint protection. For the larger deployments, we use it for our policy enforcement as well. We use AMP on the endpoints for writing automated policies in order to… more »
Top Answer: Comodo's default deny technology, their auto containment feature is awesome it puts all unknown files in a virtualized environment until a good or bad verdict is achieved. Comodo's AEP also offers 7… more »
Top Answer: Comodo's pricing is pretty good and we currently have roughly 200 licenses.
Top Answer: The ability to spit out better reporting.
Ranking
Views
15,923
Comparisons
11,329
Reviews
17
Average Words per Review
1,472
Avg. Rating
8.8
Views
1,838
Comparisons
1,466
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
630
Avg. Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Comodo AEP
Learn
Cisco
Comodo
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial BankChristian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI Properties
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
University7%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company24%
Government5%
Manufacturing Company3%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company14%
Manufacturing Company11%
Government11%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise58%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco AMP for Endpoints vs. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cisco AMP for Endpoints is ranked 6th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 18 reviews while Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is ranked 32nd in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 2 reviews. Cisco AMP for Endpoints is rated 8.8, while Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Cisco AMP for Endpoints writes "We have gained more visibility into what's going on because it detects a lot of threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection writes " Effective heuristics make for better ransomware protection". Cisco AMP for Endpoints is most compared with Microsoft Windows Defender, CrowdStrike Falcon, Carbon Black CB Defense, Symantec End-user Endpoint Security and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is most compared with Sophos Intercept X, Symantec End-user Endpoint Security, Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra, CrowdStrike Falcon and Microsoft Windows Defender. See our Cisco AMP for Endpoints vs. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.