Compare Cisco AMP for Endpoints vs. ESET Endpoint Encryption

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Broadcom and others in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers.""I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help.""For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.""The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.""The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.""The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.""I am really satisfied with the technical support.""It is a very stable program."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pros »

"The Remote Administrator is the most valuable feature that ESET offers for us. Centralized management of our ESET environment is what I like about the Remote Administrator.""The usability is the most valuable feature.""The most valuable feature is that everything is done on the server.""This solution can be centrally managed."

More ESET Endpoint Encryption Pros »

Cons
"We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released.""I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails.""The solution needs more in-depth analytics.""In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.""The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.""In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.""The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.""I would like more seamless integration."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Cons »

"I would like more robust reporting as part of the Remote Administrator.""Integration with central management needs improvement.""Sometimes the server console is very slow, so the performance could be improved.""I would like to see better compatibility with mobile devices."

More ESET Endpoint Encryption Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Instead of installing ESET on each machine at each location, we just do it remotely. This has been a time saver for us.""The National University System dedicates 500 of their 5000 licenses to us, which is $14/yr per device. Most companies are paying $99 or $120 per device a year.""Licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

More ESET Endpoint Encryption Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.
Top Answer: Nice to have URL management, password protection of the app, more details of the machine & user running the app.
Top Answer: The primary use case is for endpoint protection. For the larger deployments, we use it for our policy enforcement as well. We use AMP on the endpoints for writing automated policies in order to… more »
Top Answer: This solution can be centrally managed.
Top Answer: The updates could be improved and also done more frequently. I would like to see better compatibility with mobile devices. Most of the time, people are connecting to our server using their mobile… more »
Ranking
Views
17,297
Comparisons
12,265
Reviews
18
Average Words per Review
1,467
Rating
8.7
5th
out of 26 in Endpoint Encryption
Views
3,166
Comparisons
2,511
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
426
Rating
8.8
Popular Comparisons
Learn
Cisco
ESET
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

ESET Endpoint Encryption is a simple-to-use encryption application for companies large and small. Take advantage of the optimized setup that speeds up the time to adoption for admins. The client side requires no user interaction, increasing user compliance and the security of your company data.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about ESET Endpoint Encryption
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial BankCCS Media Limited, Mercury Engineering, , Unigarant, Pinewood Healthcare
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
University7%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company23%
Government5%
Financial Services Firm4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider34%
Computer Software Company20%
Media Company7%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise63%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Broadcom and others in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco AMP for Endpoints is ranked 6th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 18 reviews while ESET Endpoint Encryption is ranked 5th in Endpoint Encryption with 4 reviews. Cisco AMP for Endpoints is rated 8.8, while ESET Endpoint Encryption is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cisco AMP for Endpoints writes "We have gained more visibility into what's going on because it detects a lot of threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Encryption writes "Instead of installing the product on each machine at each location, we just do it remotely". Cisco AMP for Endpoints is most compared with Microsoft Defender Antivirus, CrowdStrike Falcon, Carbon Black CB Defense, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Symantec End-user Endpoint Security, whereas ESET Endpoint Encryption is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Symantec Endpoint Encryption, Sophos SafeGuard, Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade and Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption.

See our list of .

We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.