Compare Cisco AMP for Endpoints vs. ESET Endpoint Encryption

Cisco AMP for Endpoints is ranked 14th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 9 reviews while ESET Endpoint Encryption is ranked 7th in Endpoint Encryption with 1 review. Cisco AMP for Endpoints is rated 8.6, while ESET Endpoint Encryption is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cisco AMP for Endpoints writes "Offers a good scope and a good ability to shut attacks down then go back and see what happened". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Encryption writes "Instead of installing the product on each machine at each location, we just do it remotely". Cisco AMP for Endpoints is most compared with CrowdStrike, Microsoft Windows Defender and McAfee Complete Data Protection, whereas ESET Endpoint Encryption is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Symantec Endpoint Encryption and Cisco AMP for Endpoints.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec, Microsoft, HCL and others in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business. Updated: December 2019.
391,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It is a very stable program.I am really satisfied with the technical support.The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help.Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers.

Read more »

The Remote Administrator is the most valuable feature that ESET offers for us. Centralized management of our ESET environment is what I like about the Remote Administrator.

Read more »

Cons
The technical support is very slow.I would like more seamless integration.The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.The solution needs more in-depth analytics.I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails.

Read more »

I would like more robust reporting as part of the Remote Administrator.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The price is very good.The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.​Pricing can be more expensive than similar software that does less functionality, but not recognized by customers.​

Read more »

Instead of installing ESET on each machine at each location, we just do it remotely. This has been a time saver for us.The National University System dedicates 500 of their 5000 licenses to us, which is $14/yr per device. Most companies are paying $99 or $120 per device a year.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
391,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
10,279
Comparisons
6,875
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
357
Avg. Rating
8.8
7th
out of 26 in Endpoint Encryption
Views
2,497
Comparisons
2,091
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
644
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Learn
Cisco
ESET
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

ESET Endpoint Encryption is a simple-to-use encryption application for companies large and small. Take advantage of the optimized setup that speeds up the time to adoption for admins. The client side requires no user interaction, increasing user compliance and the security of your company data.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about ESET Endpoint Encryption
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial BankCCS Media Limited, Mercury Engineering, , Unigarant, Pinewood Healthcare
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company25%
Government25%
Comms Service Provider13%
University13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company23%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government10%
Construction Company6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec, Microsoft, HCL and others in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business. Updated: December 2019.
391,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.