Compare Cisco AMP for Endpoints vs. Infocyte HUNT

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Cisco and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: May 2021.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.""The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.""The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.""The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.""I am really satisfied with the technical support.""It is a very stable program.""The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.""It doesn't impact the devices. It is an agent-based solution, and we see no performance knock on cell phones. That was a big thing for us, especially in the mobile world. We don't see battery degradation like you do with other solutions which really drain the battery, as they're constantly doing things. That can shorten the useful life of a device."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pros »

"The insight that the solution provides is the most valuable aspect. The security scanning they do is excellent."

More Infocyte HUNT Pros »

Cons
"The solution needs more in-depth analytics.""In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.""The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.""In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.""The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.""I would like more seamless integration.""The technical support is very slow.""I would recommend that the solution offer more availability in terms of the product portfolio and integration with third-party products."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Cons »

"The deployment of the solution right now is terrible. We find it to be very bad. It could be improved enormously."

More Infocyte HUNT Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is signature-based malware detection.
Top Answer: Licensing fees are on a yearly basis and I am happy with the pricing.
Top Answer: The GUI needs improvement, it's not good. There are false positives in emails. At times, the emails are blocked and detected as malware when they are not. They should work on some of the signatures… more »
Top Answer: The insight that the solution provides is the most valuable aspect. The security scanning they do is excellent.
Top Answer: I didn't take part in the purchasing process and therefore can't speak to the costs surrounding licensing.
Top Answer: The deployment of the solution right now is terrible. We find it to be very bad. It could be improved enormously. The stability isn't ideal. The agents are in locked states and need to be reinstalled… more »
Ranking
Views
20,397
Comparisons
14,050
Reviews
16
Average Words per Review
1,516
Rating
8.8
Views
187
Comparisons
117
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
497
Rating
6.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco Secure Endpoint
Learn More
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

Infocyte HUNT is an “agentless” platform, designed to check the endpoints in your network for possible breaches, without requiring complex equipment and installations on the endpoints. The product complements the existing traditional defence mechanisms by combining forensic automation with patented algorithms.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about Infocyte HUNT
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial Bank
Check Point Software, PwC, Grant Thornton, AT&T, DHL, U.S. Department of Defense
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
University7%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company22%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm5%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise50%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise53%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Cisco and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: May 2021.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco AMP for Endpoints is ranked 3rd in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 17 reviews while Infocyte HUNT is ranked 22nd in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 1 review. Cisco AMP for Endpoints is rated 8.8, while Infocyte HUNT is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Cisco AMP for Endpoints writes "We have gained more visibility into what's going on because it detects a lot of threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Infocyte HUNT writes "Good security scanning, but has a complex setup and the stability isn't ideal". Cisco AMP for Endpoints is most compared with Microsoft Defender Antivirus, CrowdStrike Falcon, Carbon Black CB Defense, SentinelOne and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Infocyte HUNT is most compared with SentinelOne, CrowdStrike Falcon and Tanium.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.