Compare Cisco AMP for Endpoints vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security

Cisco AMP for Endpoints is ranked 8th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 9 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 16 reviews. Cisco AMP for Endpoints is rated 8.4, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cisco AMP for Endpoints writes "Excellent scalability with good integration capabilities and easy to deploy in Cisco ecosystems". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security writes "Enables us to reduce costs and offers manufacturing control". Cisco AMP for Endpoints is most compared with Microsoft Windows Defender, CrowdStrike and Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP), whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Security is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP), Bitdefender GravityZone and ESET Endpoint Security. See our Cisco AMP for Endpoints vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco AMP for Endpoints vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
399,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.It is a very stable program.I am really satisfied with the technical support.The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help.

Read more »

The advice I would give someone implementing this solution is that the management of the solution is very easy. You don't need a lot of people to manage the solution.The signature update is done securely.We used to have a lot of phishing attacks and all these kind of things for end-users so we decided that we needed endpoint security. We evaluated some solutions and found that Kaspersky is the most appropriate in terms of endpoint security and the speed of the user machine. The encryption is a major factor from our end.It helps to improve our security for our mobile and VMware infrastructure. The remote tasks are great.The blocking feature is the most valuable feature.The centralized management is a nice features. It gives us the leeway to deal with other things as protection is being carried on in the background. We do not have to keep on watching as long as we have the right updates. It also saves us time.It performs quite well as a firewall protection provider.We have gained advanced threat protection without investing more into that area.

Read more »

Cons
I would recommend that the solution offer more availability in terms of the product portfolio and integration with third-party products.The technical support is very slow.I would like more seamless integration.The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.The solution needs more in-depth analytics.

Read more »

This solution needs improvement in the reporting section. Reporting in Kaspersky Endpoint is good but it's not that great. The platform needs to centralize reporting control.There have been some performance issues. They provide good security, but this slows down the performance of machines' servers. The software is not updating as frequently as we need.There should be some AI involved. We already have machine learning involved in recent releases but machine learning should be more enhanced in the upcoming versions.The reports aren't so good. To make it a perfect ten they should improve the reports and web interface.It needs more computer resources. They should have more anti-spam features.If someone has the older version of the solution, and wants to install a newer version, they must remove all of the previous applications. Otherwise, there will be issues with the solution.I would like to see better reporting.It's does not have the architecture or structure to scale up.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The price is very good.The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.

Read more »

It's a little more expensive compared to other competitors like Symantec.The licensing is fine, and it is well within reasonable rates.It is a cost-effective product.I received a very good deal with Kaspersky.It is a cost-effective endpoint security service.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
399,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
10,784
Comparisons
7,321
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
411
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
12,809
Comparisons
11,014
Reviews
15
Average Words per Review
296
Avg. Rating
7.8
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
Kaspersky Work Space Security
Learn
Cisco
Kaspersky Lab
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security is a multi-layered endpoint protection platform, based on true cybersecurity technologies. This tightly integrated solution combines fully scalable protection capabilities for physical, virtual and cloud-based endpoints including desktops, servers, mobile devices and embedded systems. Every endpoint can be managed through one unified console, giving you a complete security overview, no matter how extensive your infrastructure. Kaspersky Endpoint Security delivers a reliable, enterprise-ready security platform, providing data to automatically enrich your SOC. Endpoint vulnerabilities and protection are managed together through one console, improving efficiency and reducing your TCO. It protects you from ransomware, exploits and even the most advanced forms of cyberthreats. It has Easy and effective centralized web, device and application controls reduce your attack surface and help keep users safe. And FIPS 140.2 certified full disk encryption helps fully protect confidential data on stationary and mobile devices.
Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about Kaspersky Endpoint Security
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial BankACMS, Arqiva, Pakistan International Airlines, RAO UES
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company25%
Government25%
Manufacturing Company13%
Comms Service Provider13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company25%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government9%
Construction Company6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Construction Company20%
Healthcare Company10%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company22%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm8%
Retailer7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco AMP for Endpoints vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
399,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.