Compare Cisco AMP for Endpoints vs. McAfee Complete Data Protection

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Broadcom and others in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business. Updated: December 2020.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers.""I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help.""For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.""The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.""The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.""The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.""I am really satisfied with the technical support.""It is a very stable program."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pros »

"With this solution, the device control is more reliable and more stable.""I don't need to have any interaction with this product, which means that it is very, very good, and it is doing its job.""It is capable of acting as Web control, Device Control, or Data Control.""The McAfee Threat Protection and McAfee Web Protection are valuable aspects of the solution. They're better than other features that come with the endpoints.""In the configuration, you can restrict a user from accessing a removable drive.""The interface is very good. You can create and manage your own dashboard.""With McAfee Complete Data Protection, you can managed all your security solutions from one single server and one interface. This might be the most powerful advantage of McAfee's solution.""The server software console is exquisitely designed and organized for handy access and manipulation by the administrator."

More McAfee Complete Data Protection Pros »

Cons
"We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released.""I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails.""The solution needs more in-depth analytics.""In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.""The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.""In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.""The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.""I would like more seamless integration."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Cons »

"The solution should be more user-friendly.""This solution does not do as well at protecting the end-user against unknown viruses.""It is difficult to manage.""The solution needs to reduce the number of false positives. There are too many of them.""I want simplicity. A new user opening the dashboard will be confused. It needs to be more user-friendly.""The refresh feature needs improvement. You need to refresh it manually yt going to the address bar, clicking on it and pressing enter, or pressing F5. There should be a button you can click on to refresh or have it so every five seconds it's refreshing.""The product consumes too much RAM and CPU for its processing and this can lead to resource issues on PCs.""I would like to have an easier and less-hassle upgrade process in future releases of the software, and extra license renewal price discounts too."

More McAfee Complete Data Protection Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price of this solution needs to be improved.""The price is good, it's a low-cost solution.""This solution is reasonably priced.""The pricing is better than that of some competing products.""The pricing of the cloud offering seems confusing."

More McAfee Complete Data Protection Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.
Top Answer: Nice to have URL management, password protection of the app, more details of the machine & user running the app.
Top Answer: The primary use case is for endpoint protection. For the larger deployments, we use it for our policy enforcement as well. We use AMP on the endpoints for writing automated policies in order to… more »
Top Answer: The solution is excellent for protecting users from data being exploited. It's also great for preventing data leakage.
Top Answer: The solution needs more advanced features. Customers tend to not like the navigation that is offered. While accessing the DLP is easy, navigating inside of it is difficult. The policies and… more »
Ranking
Views
17,297
Comparisons
12,265
Reviews
18
Average Words per Review
1,467
Rating
8.7
4th
out of 26 in Endpoint Encryption
Views
4,937
Comparisons
4,130
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
652
Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Learn
Cisco
McAfee
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

Sensitive data is constantly at risk of loss, theft, and exposure. Many times, the data simply walks right out the front door on a laptop or USB device. Companies that suffer such a data loss risk serious consequences, including regulatory penalties, public disclosure, brand damage, customer distrust, and financial losses. According to a Ponemon Institute report, 7% of all corporate laptops will be lost or stolen sometime during their useful life. The rapid proliferation of mobile devices with large storage capacities and often internet access is opening up even more channels for data loss or theft, so protecting sensitive, proprietary, and personally identifiable information must be a top priority. McAfee Complete Data Protection Suites address all of these concerns and many more.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about McAfee Complete Data Protection
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial BankXcel Energy
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
Construction Company7%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company23%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider17%
Government11%
Insurance Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise61%
REVIEWERS
Small Business58%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise25%
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Broadcom and others in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business. Updated: December 2020.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco AMP for Endpoints is ranked 6th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 18 reviews while McAfee Complete Data Protection is ranked 4th in Endpoint Encryption with 11 reviews. Cisco AMP for Endpoints is rated 8.8, while McAfee Complete Data Protection is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cisco AMP for Endpoints writes "We have gained more visibility into what's going on because it detects a lot of threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee Complete Data Protection writes "An excellent solution for protecting from data exposure, device protection, and shadow IT". Cisco AMP for Endpoints is most compared with Microsoft Defender Antivirus, CrowdStrike Falcon, Carbon Black CB Defense, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Kaspersky Endpoint Security, whereas McAfee Complete Data Protection is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Symantec Endpoint Encryption, Sophos SafeGuard, Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption and Carbon Black CB Defense.

See our list of .

We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.