Compare Cisco AMP for Endpoints vs. SentinelOne

Cisco AMP for Endpoints is ranked 14th in Endpoint Protection for Business with 7 reviews while SentinelOne is ranked 11th in Endpoint Protection for Business with 11 reviews. Cisco AMP for Endpoints is rated 8.8, while SentinelOne is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cisco AMP for Endpoints writes "Offers a good scope and a good ability to shut attacks down then go back and see what happened". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne writes "AI-powered protection, data-rollback ability, and seamless integration with SolarWinds". Cisco AMP for Endpoints is most compared with McAfee Complete Data Protection, CrowdStrike and Microsoft Windows Defender, whereas SentinelOne is most compared with Cylance, CrowdStrike and Carbon Black CB Defense. See our Cisco AMP for Endpoints vs. SentinelOne report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco AMP for Endpoints vs. SentinelOne and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
377,828 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help.Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers.Real-time threat prevention using sandboxing, file trajectory, and retrospective security.

Read more »

It has the ability to rollback a ransomware infection instantly and with minimal disruption to the user & provides robust reporting.The solution offers very rich details surrounding threats or attacks.We have a preference for their receptor. It's good at finding many EFC files. EFC files could have a virus.The most valuable feature of this solution is the user-friendly interface.All of the features are valuable. The way that it integrates into management with fault correction capabilities over is especially valuable. Any of the full gamut of the features that it provides are useful to us.I have found the activity timeline and threat analysis to be particularly useful.In the past, we were not able to identify a few viruses, but now we are able to identify them because of the machine learning feature.It has good visibility features and it's straightforward.

Read more »

Cons
The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.The solution needs more in-depth analytics.I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails.We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released.It does not include encryption and decryption of local file shares.

Read more »

Set up is very labor-intensive.The solution needs better reporting on new threats and malware. The reporting is present, but I can't find the information easily.It's fine. It's correcting all the EFC files with a virus. All the achievements, maximum EFC files. Many EFC files will be flagged as a virus. Some virus databases need to be updated. The model is good at finding many EFC files. The trouble is it needs to be updated.This solution would be more attractive to customers if the price were lower.In terms of improvement, I would like to see better alerting to let us know if there is anything wrong with SentinelOne working on the endpoint of the computer.I would like to see something a little more sophisticated than simply being able to mark a false positive as safe or there's usually just one or two options in certain areas and they're a little rudimentary at this stage.The reporting needs improvement and I would like to see a more granular level of administrative privileges.There is not much flexibility in terms of policy fine-tuning. We can turn it off or turn it on, but, there's nothing much else to do. Everything is predefined. It's good in a way, but you don't get much flexibility if you want to do something particular.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.​Pricing can be more expensive than similar software that does less functionality, but not recognized by customers.​

Read more »

The per-seat cost is low, but you have to commit to a certain number of licenses for a year.The price for it is very competitive compared to other Next Gen EPP.Spend money on the security for the endpoint.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection for Business solutions are best for your needs.
377,828 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
9,365
Comparisons
6,089
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
377
Avg. Rating
8.9
Views
17,539
Comparisons
11,894
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
412
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
Sentinel Labs
Learn
Cisco
SentinelOne
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

SentinelOne Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) unifies prevention, detection and response in a single platform driven by sophisticated machine learning and intelligent automation. It enables you to prevent and detect attacks across all major vectors, rapidly eliminate threats with fully automated, policy-driven response capabilities, and gain complete visibility into your endpoint environment with full-context, real-time forensics.

SentinelOne also offers Ransomware Cyber Guarantee, which is an opt-in program that provides SentinelOne Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) customers with financial support against demanded ransoms in the event an organization is infected with ransomware and EPP is unable to successfully block or remediate its effects.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about SentinelOne
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial BankBOX, VISA, RKON, LCRA
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company29%
Government29%
Reseller14%
Comms Service Provider14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company24%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government13%
Construction Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company26%
Media Company11%
Comms Service Provider8%
Retailer8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco AMP for Endpoints vs. SentinelOne and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
377,828 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email