Cisco APIC-EM [EOL] vs Cisco DNA Virtualization [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco APIC-EM [EOL] and Cisco DNA Virtualization [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Array Networks and others in Network Virtualization.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Virtualization Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Eliminating the IT administration silos for our datacenter and infrastructure by providing a single managed and converged infrastructure which provides unified compute, storage, and networking environment with a single point of management.""The environment enables a DevOps culture, continuous delivery, and automated processes.""Enabling business agility and accelerated time to market with the automated service delivery."

More Cisco APIC-EM [EOL] Pros →

"Cisco has a good technical support team.""The management aspect of the solution is its most valuable feature. Software-defined issues have been good for us. It makes the management process easy."

More Cisco DNA Virtualization [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"Need a better workflow definition tool with tracking on existing provisioned services, and to improve multitasking in the workflow automation."

More Cisco APIC-EM [EOL] Cons →

"It would be helpful to have better information on how to implement this product.""The stability of the solution could be improved."

More Cisco DNA Virtualization [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Ranking
Unranked
In Network Virtualization
Unranked
In Network Virtualization
Buyer's Guide
Network Virtualization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Array Networks and others in Network Virtualization. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller Enterprise Module
Cisco Digital Network Architecture (DNA) Virtualization
Learn More
Overview

APIC-EM is a central part of Cisco Digital Network Architecture. It delivers software-defined networking to the enterprise branch, campus, and WAN. Its simple user interface lets you automate policy-based application profiles. With this module, IT can respond rapidly to new business opportunities. 

Connect users to applications with one seamless network using Cisco Digital Network Architecture (DNA) Virtualization

Buyer's Guide
Network Virtualization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Array Networks and others in Network Virtualization. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco APIC-EM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Virtualization while Cisco DNA Virtualization [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Virtualization. Cisco APIC-EM [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Cisco DNA Virtualization [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco APIC-EM [EOL] writes "Enabling business agility and accelerated time to market with the automated service delivery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco DNA Virtualization [EOL] writes "Scalable with a straightforward setup and good management capabilities". Cisco APIC-EM [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Cisco DNA Virtualization [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Network Virtualization vendors.

We monitor all Network Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.