Compare Cisco ASA NGFW vs. SonicWall TZ

Cisco ASA NGFW is ranked 2nd in Firewalls with 60 reviews while SonicWall TZ is ranked 17th in Firewalls with 14 reviews. Cisco ASA NGFW is rated 7.6, while SonicWall TZ is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Cisco ASA NGFW writes "Enables us to to track traffic in inbound and outbound patterns so we can set expectations for network traffic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonicWall TZ writes "The product's modular nature is a huge plus, but work is needed on the ransomware application". Cisco ASA NGFW is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Meraki MX Firewalls and Cisco Firepower NGFW, whereas SonicWall TZ is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, pfSense and Cisco ASA NGFW. See our Cisco ASA NGFW vs. SonicWall TZ report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco ASA NGFW Logo
70,048 views|52,237 comparisons
SonicWall TZ Logo
29,802 views|25,659 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco ASA NGFW vs. SonicWall TZ and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The firepower sensors have been great; they do a good job of dropping unwanted traffic.Unfortunately in Cisco, only the hardware was good.The most important point is the detection engine which is now part of the next-generation firewalls and which is supported by Cisco Talos.The most valuable features are the flexibility and level of security that this solution provides.Integration with all the other Cisco tools is valuable.We moved from a legacy firewall to the ASA with FirePOWER, increasing our Internet Edge defense dramatically.Cisco ASA NGFW significantly improves our bank. It protects any high-value products that we use from hackers, viruses, malware, and script-bots. It gives us metrics on network traffic as well as what kind of attacks we are getting from the outside.Right now, Cisco ASA NGFW has given us a lot of improvement. We are planning to move to a new facility and will be a much larger organization.

Read more »

I find the security we are able to do with the policies to be valuable. The monitoring is valuable as well.Once it's configured properly, the solution is unbreakable.They give good protection to my network and support it.No negative impression of the scalability.The features that we have found most valuable in SonicWall TZ are the intrusion and brute force attack prevention.The stability is very nice.The feature we found most valuable in SonicWall TZ is that it is user-friendly for an administrator.SonicWall TZ is stable.

Read more »

Cons
The software was very buggy, to the point it had to be removed.In NGFW, Cisco should be aligned with the new technology and inspection intelligence because Cisco is far behind in this pipeline.Most users do not have awareness of this product's functionality and features. Cisco should do something to make them aware of them. That would be quite excellent and useful to organizations that are still using legacy data-center-security products.There was an error in the configuration, related to our uplink switches, that caused us to contact technical support, and it took a very long time to resolve the issue.With regards to stability, we had a critical bug come out during our evaluation... not good.The product would be improved if the GUI could be brought into the 21st Century.Cisco should improve its user interface design. There is a deep learning curve to the product if you are a newcomer.There is no support here in Georgia. If something goes wrong, support is not always very helpful with the other firewalls or other products.

Read more »

Full monitoring obviously needs to be improved. We need full monitoring covered under the security licensing.They should consider working a bit more on their ransomware application.I currently have two of the issues from SonicWall. One issue is that the IP is not the public IP. Sometimes it moves to an alternate source and I have to refresh the new IP then we can go on.The small business line has less PPS throughput.The log analyzer in SonicWall TZ is something that they need to improve upon.There can be an improvement in analysis and reporting. We need enhancement on the reporting side.We would like to improve the rules configuration in SonicWall TZ. Sometimes the rules don't work.I can't get the support that I need from SonicWall.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Always consider what you might need to reduce your wasted time and invest it in other solutions.Watch out for hidden licensing and incredibly high annual maintenance costs.We paid about $7,000 for the Cisco firewall, plus another small Cisco router and the lead switch. It was under the combined license. It's a final agreement.The cost is a big factor for us. This is why we are using it only in our restricted area. They are very much higher than their competitors in the market.Licensing is expensive compared to other solutions.Pricing is high, but it is essentially a corporate decision.The cost is a bit high compared to other solutions in the market.Cisco recently has become very expensive.

Read more »

License renewals come in around $35,000 to $45,000.Licensing costs have been around $2,000. There are no other costs above the standard licensing fees.The product pricing is relatively good, compared to other products, including the licenses.The pricing was a factor for us, and we felt that the price was good.Getting licenses in our country, Ghana, is not easy. Though, once we have them, adding them is quick (about a day).SonicWall has authorized distributors in our country. They have about two or three distributors in the country, so it makes it a bit easier. What we do is to request a quotation from these distributors, then we do a value for money analysis and see which one of them is giving us a competitive price.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
2nd
out of 50 in Firewalls
Views
70,048
Comparisons
52,237
Reviews
57
Average Words per Review
309
Avg. Rating
7.9
17th
out of 50 in Firewalls
Views
29,802
Comparisons
25,659
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
425
Avg. Rating
7.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
Cisco ASA, Adaptive Security Appliance, ASADell SonicWALL TZ
Learn
Cisco
SonicWall
Overview

Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) is Cisco's end-to-end software solution and core operating system that powers the Cisco ASA product series. This software solution provides enterprise-level firewall capabilities for all types of ASA products, including blades, standalone appliances and virtual devices. Adaptive Security Appliance provides protection to organizations of all sizes, and allows end-users to access information securely anywhere, at any time, and through any device.

Adaptive Security Appliance is also fully compatible with other key security technologies, and so provides organizations with an all-encompassing security solution.

Block more threats and quickly mitigate those that do breach your defenses with the industry’s first threat-focused NGFW.

The secure, sophisticated SonicWALL TZ is widely deployed at small businesses, retail, government, remote sites and branch offices. It combines high-performance intrusion prevention, malware blocking, content/URL filtering and application control.
Offer
Learn more about Cisco ASA NGFW
Learn more about SonicWall TZ
Sample Customers
There are more than one million Adaptive Security Appliances deployed globally. Top customers include First American Financial Corp., Genzyme, Frankfurt Airport, Hansgrohe SE, Rio Olympics, The French Laundry, Rackspace, and City of Tomorrow.AeroM_xico Delta TechOps, Unimat
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm17%
Comms Service Provider11%
Manufacturing Company11%
University8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company28%
Comms Service Provider15%
Media Company8%
Manufacturing Company6%
REVIEWERS
Construction Company30%
Manufacturing Company20%
Aerospace/Defense Firm10%
Comms Service Provider10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company24%
Comms Service Provider13%
Retailer6%
Media Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise38%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business37%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise39%
REVIEWERS
Small Business59%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise15%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco ASA NGFW vs. SonicWall TZ and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email