Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco ASAv vs. Cisco Sourcefire Firewalls and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
For us, the most valuable features are the IPX and the Sourcefire Defense Center module. That gives us visibility into the traffic coming in and going out, and gives us the heads-up if there is a potential outbreak or potential malicious user who is trying to access the site. It also helps us see traffic generated by an end device trying to reach out to the world.
The information coming from Talos does a good job... I like the fact that Cisco is working with them and getting the information from them and updating the firewall.
The firepower sensors have been great; they do a good job of dropping unwanted traffic.
Unfortunately in Cisco, only the hardware was good.
The most important point is the detection engine which is now part of the next-generation firewalls and which is supported by Cisco Talos.
The most valuable features are the flexibility and level of security that this solution provides.
Integration with all the other Cisco tools is valuable.
We moved from a legacy firewall to the ASA with FirePOWER, increasing our Internet Edge defense dramatically.
For business purposes, it's a very detailed solution, which is it's greatest benefit, as you can get almost any piece of information you need from the solution. It allows for admins to be able to troubleshoot pretty easily.
A stable and solid solution for protection from external threats and for VPN connections.
The best solutions for our company are those we have yet to implement so it will be even better in the future for us than it already is.
The stability is good. Very simple. Upgrades are great.
The feature I find most valuable is the Cisco VPN Interconnection.
What I like about Cisco is the security zone. By default when you configure it, it gives you a security zone, which other firewalls don't have.
We are using the Cisco AnyConnect for our end-user VPN with the ASA.
The basic setup is fine. We're just one person. It's only when you want to do some more sophisticated setup like channeling and stuff like that that it's more complicated.
The most valuable feature of this solution is AMP (Advanced Malware Protection), as this is really needed to protect against cyber threats.
I like the Cisco ASDM (Adaptive Security Device Manager), which is the configuration interface for the Cisco firewall.
The technical team is always available when we have problems.
The stability of the solution is very good. We can see that it gets even better with every release.
The most valuable feature is that it has the ability to divide the network into three parts; internal, external, and DMZ.
A powerful enterprise security solution that is dependible.
The most valuable feature of this solution is its ability to integrate vertically.
An efficient, easy to deploy and dependable firewall solution.
We were also not too thrilled when Cisco announced that in the upcoming new-gen ASA, iOS was not going to be supported, or if you install them, they will not be able to be managed through the Sourcefire. However, it seems like Cisco is moving away from the ASA iOS to the Sourcefire FireSIGHT firmware for the ASA. We haven't had a chance to test it out.
Our latest experience with a code upgrade included a number of bugs and issues that we ran into. So more testing with their code, before it hits us, would help.
The software was very buggy, to the point it had to be removed.
In NGFW, Cisco should be aligned with the new technology and inspection intelligence because Cisco is far behind in this pipeline.
Most users do not have awareness of this product's functionality and features. Cisco should do something to make them aware of them. That would be quite excellent and useful to organizations that are still using legacy data-center-security products.
There was an error in the configuration, related to our uplink switches, that caused us to contact technical support, and it took a very long time to resolve the issue.
With regards to stability, we had a critical bug come out during our evaluation... not good.
The product would be improved if the GUI could be brought into the 21st Century.
I'm working on a slightly older version, but what it needs is a better alert management. It's pretty standard, but there's no real advanced features involved around it.
It is not the newest, cutting-edge technology
The user interface is too complex for people who are not trained to or certified to engage with the product. The interface should be easier to use.
They really need support for deployment.
They should allow customers to talk to them directly instead of having to go through the reseller.
I wish the Cisco interface was not so granular. Check Point was easier to create specific rules than with ASAv.
I would like to see them release a patch for ASAv with cross-platform FirePower integration.
The user interface is old fashioned.
I have found that Cisco reporting capabilities are not as rich as other products, so the reporting could be improved.
The Sandbox and the Web Censoring in this solution need to be improved.
It will be nice if they had what you traditionally would use a web application scanner for. If the solution could take a deeper look into HTTP and HTTPS traffic, that would be nice.
I would like for the user interface to be easier for the admin and network admin. I would also like to be able to access everything from the GUI interface. The way it is now, it needs somebody experience in iOS to be able to operate it. I would like to have a GUI interface.
The GUI interface could be improved when compared to other solutions.
There used to be information displayed about the packets in a module called Packet Flow, but it is no longer there.
The interface for monitoring could be improved to allow better views to make troubleshooting easier.
The inclusion of an autofill feature would improve the ease of commands.
Pricing and Cost Advice
Pricing varies on the model and the features we are using. It could be anywhere from $600 to $1000 to up to $7,000 per year, depending on what model and what feature sets are available to us.
We used Check Point and the two are comparable. Cost was really what put us onto the ASAs... the price tag for Check Point was exorbitantly more than what it is for the ASA solution.
Always consider what you might need to reduce your wasted time and invest it in other solutions.
Watch out for hidden licensing and incredibly high annual maintenance costs.
We paid about $7,000 for the Cisco firewall, plus another small Cisco router and the lead switch. It was under the combined license. It's a final agreement.
The cost is a big factor for us. This is why we are using it only in our restricted area. They are very much higher than their competitors in the market.
Licensing is expensive compared to other solutions.
Pricing is high, but it is essentially a corporate decision.
It would be nice if pricing could do more to reflect the economy of the country where the product is being implemented.
This solution might be expensive, but it is economical in the long run.
With AnyConnect, it depends on your license. It depends on the number of concurrent users you want to connect.
I bought a license for three years and it was really affordable.
We are partners with Cisco. They are always one call away, which is good. They know how to keep their customers happy.
With the Cisco ASA, you do get what you pay for. What would really be awesome is to see Cisco blow out a real cheap version where you can use the sandbox, but leave it step-wise and go to another product relatively easily, like getting you hooked on candy.
Purchasing from the AWS Marketplace was easy. It was just point and click.
It is pay-as-you-go, so it much cheaper than buying in the plants.
We are in the process of renewing our three-year license, which costs approximately $24,000 USD for the thirty-six months.
The pricing for Cisco products is higher than others, but Cisco is a very good, strong, and stable technology.
The program is very expensive.
The cost of this solution is high.
Some of our customers would be more likely to standardize on Cisco equipment if the cost was lower because a lot of people install cheap equipment.
Compared 39% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
|Cisco ASA, Adaptive Security Appliance, ASA||Adaptive Security Virtual Appliance||Sourcefire Firewalls|
Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) is Cisco's end-to-end software solution and core operating system that powers the Cisco ASA product series. This software solution provides enterprise-level firewall capabilities for all types of ASA products, including blades, standalone appliances and virtual devices. Adaptive Security Appliance provides protection to organizations of all sizes, and allows end-users to access information securely anywhere, at any time, and through any device.
Adaptive Security Appliance is also fully compatible with other key security technologies, and so provides organizations with an all-encompassing security solution.
Block more threats and quickly mitigate those that do breach your defenses with the industry’s first threat-focused NGFW.
|Sourcefire Firewalls help ensure your network's availability and the security of your company's resources by protecting the network infrastructure against network- and application-layer attacks, viruses, and worms.|
Learn more about Cisco ASA NGFW
Learn more about Cisco ASAv
Learn more about Cisco Sourcefire Firewalls
|There are more than one million Adaptive Security Appliances deployed globally. Top customers include First American Financial Corp., Genzyme, Frankfurt Airport, Hansgrohe SE, Rio Olympics, The French Laundry, Rackspace, and City of Tomorrow.||Bluelock||Aegean Motorway, EllisDon Corporation, Linz AG,|
Financial Services Firm17%
Comms Service Provider11%
Software R&D Company28%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm27%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm40%
K 12 Educational Company Or School10%