Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Catalyst Switches vs. VMware NSX and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
The new series has lots of great features, it's really lovely. From a management perspective, or a policy creation perspective, which we are seeing in the Catalyst 9000 series it is great.
We heavily use the SmartPort features. It has really helped us. The U.S. policies are handled by the auto SmartPort feature
It has become easier for us to troubleshoot and find issues faster in the management software for the switches. It saves us troubleshooting time because if the network is down it has a big impact on production.
Their technical support is very good. They know what to do and if they don't know what to do, they give me the person who does know.
The stability and Cisco's support are the most valuable features.
Their technical support is good, one of the best in the industry.
The 802.1X port security and other security features work well and help keep the network secure.
The CLI is pretty much the same across all switching and routing platforms from Cisco, making deployment of new switches, replacement of damaged equipment, or upgrades to newer platforms very easy.
It has reduced the number of people on the network team along with the system engineer involved in the security process. So, it is valuable.
From a distributed firewall perspective, it's a solid solution.
Their technical support is good. It's a complex solution and they're there to help with anything that comes up.
Their technical support is very good. They help us figure out solutions when we have problems.
The initial setup was straightforward. It follows a certain structure and you won't miss a step. It's all on the same level, step by step.
We like that everything is integrated.
You can easily integrate this with other VMware products. It is a robust solution.
The firewall is its most valuable feature.
The current catalyst is probably outdated so we will most likely move to the newer version of the solution soon.
They should make so that they let users know five to ten minutes before productivity is restored in the case of power loss.
The newer models are not so stable. Other products like 6800, 3750, were stable but starting from 3850 it got worse. We have a lot of issues and a lot of bugs. It's a new product so it's understandable but it should be improved.
It should have better security and the prices can always be lower. The cheaper the price, the better but if the quality is good, it's worth it. They also have to improve the firewalling.
The prices are high. It's more expensive than other similar options.
To make it a ten they should simplify the licensing, add the cloud-managed feature, and it should be more cost-effective.
Cisco should focus more on this type of product instead of on data center switches. They stopped improving the software of these switches and they are focusing on the data center. They should focus on this type of product, more than any other thing.
One feature that I would like to add is for the following: At times, when I add an access-list for a hostname, it doesn't actually add the hostname, it adds the IP address. So in the back-end, if my server changes the IP address I have to go in manually and change the IP address. If the capability was there in Cisco to add a hostname instead of the IP address that would be really good.
We would to have a reverse proxy. This would add great value to the solution.
We would like better integration with the standards on the market. For example, with OSPF, their integration in NSX is very low. It's not a full OSPF integration. It is too thin from a protocol perspective.
It's not channel-friendly because it's very complex. VMware wants to be very involved because they don't want the partner to mislead an end user with that state of the art technology.
The initial establishment can be complex.
I would like them to make integration with other vendors easier.
The solution is complex but for the key user, it's not really complex. You just need to learn the standards and mechanics for your specific product.
If you're worried that NSX is too complex, I would tell you to take another look. If you compare NSX to a similar solution you might find it to be a bit more complex. Usually, the guy that comes in to implement NSX isn't the network guy and will lack the knowledge for the program. He can lack the knowledge for this program and will therefore think it's complex. You need somebody with network experience.
We would like tenant segmentation available in future releases.
Pricing and Cost Advice
It's very pricey. Compared to competitors, it's a lot more expensive.
The price is on the higher side.
Pricing of Cisco equipment is high, but I think these switches are worth the price.
I would rate the features-to-pricing ratio at six out of 10. My advice about licensing is that you should have a perpetual license, not one that is subscription-based.
Catalyst is very expensive.
Pricing is an issue I have been facing, in comparison with HPE or Juniper. The Nexus series is out of the question right now. Scalability is more an issue on the pricing side and less on the technology side.
Generally, Cisco Catalyst would be relatively expensive compared to the competition, it would be on the expensive side.
If you consider Cisco's price with the Dell, you will definitely lose with Cisco. But Cisco has a major area of equipment in general. Cisco has routers, firewalls, NAC, certain video conferencing, Apple phones, and different security solutions. But Dell doesn't have such areas, Dell only has switching architecture.
We can't go without NSX, so it's invaluable from this perspective.
The solution is very expensive.
We haven't had to hire a dedicated network engineer because NSX handles 90 percent of it. The reduced overhead in terms of managing networks has been the biggest plus.
We have saved man-hours and decreased our security exposure.
out of 18 in Data Center Networking
Average Words per Review
out of 18 in Data Center Networking
Average Words per Review
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
|Cisco Catalyst, Catalyst||VMware Nicira|
|Web-based CRM that manages events, sales, marketing campaigns & contacts, offers customer history, case management, email integration.||VMware NSX is the network virtualization platform for the Software-Defined Data Center (SDDC). By bringing the operational model of a virtual machine to your data center network, you can transform the economics of network and security operations. NSX lets you treat your physical network as a pool of transport capacity, with network and security services attached to VMs with a policy-driven approach.|
Learn more about Cisco Catalyst Switches
Learn more about VMware NSX
|Afni, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Del Papa Distributing, Explorer Pipeline, Mindtree, Omaha World Herald, Radio 538, Sony Corporation, Telecom Italia, Telenor Arena||City of Avondale, Lumeta, Kroll Ontrack, Heartland Payment Systems, Baystate Heallth, Exostar, Tribune Media, iGATE, NTT Communications, Synergent, California Natural Resources Agency, Bloomington Public Schools, Columbia Sportswear, Join Experience S.A, Schuberg Philis|
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm17%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm16%
Software R&D Company14%
Comms Service Provider11%
Mining And Metals Company11%
Software R&D Company35%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm5%