Compare Cisco CloudCenter vs. Turbonomic

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco CloudCenter Logo
3,829 views|2,606 comparisons
Turbonomic Logo
12,145 views|5,804 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco CloudCenter vs. Turbonomic and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
If a customer is only using, say, less than 10 terabytes, I don't think CVO would be a good option. A customer using at least 100 or 200 terabytes should get a reasonable price from NetApp.Once we deploy the pay as you go model, we cannot convert this product as a BYOL model. This is a concern that we have.They have a very good price which keeps our customers happy.They give us a good price for CVO licenses. It is one of the reasons that we went with the product.For NetApp it's about $20,000 for a single node and $30,000 for the HA.Our licensing costs are folded into the hardware purchases and I have never differentiated between the two.Cost is a big factor, because a lot of companies can't afford enterprise grade equipment all the time. They skimp where they can. I would recommend that they improve the cost.Cloud is cloud. It's still expensive. Any good solution comes with a price tag. That's where we are looking to see how well we can manage our data in the cloud by trying to optimize the costs.

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution’s unified file and block-storage access across our infrastructure is invaluable. Without it, we can't do what we do.
Top Answer: Our licensing costs are folded into the hardware purchases and I have never differentiated between the two.
Top Answer: I suspect ONTAP will just end up being a portion that runs on StorageGRID. Ultimately, everything will be object-based, then you'll just have a little dock of ONTAP that will do your NFS and CIFS.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVOCliQr, CliQr CloudCenterVMTurbo Operations Manager
Learn
NetApp
Cisco
Turbonomic
Overview

The leading enterprise-grade storage management solution, delivers secure, proven storage management services and supports up to a capacity of 368TB. Software service supports various use cases, such as: File shares and block-level storage serving NAS (NFS, SMB / CIFS) and SAN (iSCSI) Disaster Recovery, Backup, and Archive DevOps Databases (SQL, Oracle, NoSQL) Cloud Volumes ONTAP is offered in a standard single-node configuration or in a High Availability (HA) configuration.

The Cisco CloudCenter solution is an application-centric hybrid cloud management platform that securely provisions infrastructure resources and deploys applications to data center, private cloud, and public cloud environments.

With Cisco CloudCenter breakthrough application-centric technology, users
can:

  • Model: Quickly and easily build a cloud-independent application profile that defines the deployment and management requirements of an entire application stack.
  • Deploy: Use one click to deploy the application profile and related components and data to any data center or cloud environment.
  • Manage: Apply a wide range of application lifecycle actions to set policies to enable in-place scaling, support cross-environment bursting or high availability and disaster recovery, and stop the deployment.

Turbonomic Application Resource Management matches application demand to infrastructure supply to continuously ensure application performance. The software integrates with leading APM and IT service management solutions to form a control plane to automate IT resource management, on-premises and in multicloud environments.

Offer
Take Control with Unified Cloud Storage

Sign up for a 30-day trial to see how Cloud Volumes ONTAP can help you optimize cloud storage costs and performance, while enhancing data enterprise-grade protection, security, and compliance - wherever your data lives.

Learn more about Cisco CloudCenter
Learn more about Turbonomic
Sample Customers
Rohit, AdvacnedMD, D2L, Trinity Mirror, Eidos Media, WireStorm, Cordant Group, JFK Medical Center, ALD Automotive, Healthix, City of Baton Rouge, ON Semiconductor NTT, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), CollabNet, Pratt & Miller, PZFlexJPMorgan Chase, First Canadian Title, UBS, Aetna, Alpha Maxx, London School of Economics, Expedia, JMC Steel Group, Southern Waste Systems.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company27%
Energy/Utilities Company12%
Comms Service Provider8%
Manufacturing Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Manufacturing Company13%
Comms Service Provider9%
Media Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider54%
Computer Software Company22%
Government4%
Retailer3%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm14%
Healthcare Company14%
Manufacturing Company12%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider20%
Retailer6%
Media Company4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise77%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise83%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise28%
Large Enterprise61%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise47%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco CloudCenter vs. Turbonomic and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cisco CloudCenter is ranked 4th in Cloud Migration with 2 reviews while Turbonomic is ranked 2nd in Cloud Migration with 3 reviews. Cisco CloudCenter is rated 7.0, while Turbonomic is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Cisco CloudCenter writes "Provides a single pane of glass to enable us to provide infrastructure services to our clients". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbonomic writes "I find the Assure Service Performance that appears on the dashboard the most useful item. This option shows virtual machines that may need additional memory or CPU". Cisco CloudCenter is most compared with VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), Cisco Intersight, Cisco UCS Director, VMware vRealize Operations (vROps) and vCloud Director, whereas Turbonomic is most compared with VMware vRealize Operations (vROps), Densify, CloudHealth, VMware vRealize Automation (vRA) and Cisco Intersight. See our Cisco CloudCenter vs. Turbonomic report.

See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors and best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.