Compare Cisco CloudCenter vs. VMware vRealize Operations (vROps)

Cisco CloudCenter is ranked 6th in Cloud Management with 1 review while VMware vRealize Operations (vROps) is ranked 1st in Cloud Management with 120 reviews. Cisco CloudCenter is rated 8.0, while VMware vRealize Operations (vROps) is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco CloudCenter writes "Provides a single pane of glass to enable us to provide infrastructure services to our clients". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware vRealize Operations (vROps) writes "Well integrated with other products, but it was not enterprise-ready for a company our size". Cisco CloudCenter is most compared with VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), Cisco UCS Director and Red Hat CloudForms, whereas VMware vRealize Operations (vROps) is most compared with Turbonomic, VMware vSphere and Veeam ONE.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Turbonomic, Apache and others in Cloud Management. Updated: December 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Upgrades are very simple as well because they've allowed us to get updates directly in the CloudCenter Suite manager. If you need to do an upgrade to your setup afterward, you just push a button and it rolls out the parts and retires the old ones. It's seamless and very simple compared to what we've done before.

Read more »

The most valuables features are the collection of assets, security, and configuration data settings from each networked virtual environment in the system.Vmware always gives us the best support. They are friendly to talk to and they understand the real impact of what's happening. They are trying to get into the issue as one of your team. They also fit into your working hours to solve your issues.The reporting is a fantastic tool. It's a great tool for generating reports on different things, and for historically looking at performance metrics to help solve performance problems in an application stack.This solution is most definitely scalable. We've already gone back to the drawing board and specifically designed it from the ground up, to be scalable with the size of our environment moving forward.We do not have any problems with the product. It solves our problems. We now know if something is on the console and if there really is a problem. Before this, we had a lot of false positives. It digs into the problems and then at the end it just drops it.This solution has improved my organization by claiming back resources that have been wasted on applications or on servers that just didn't need them. Having a tool that shows that information on a pretty regular basis has been very helpful.It is stable. I don't have any problems with this product and upgrades are very easy because it's just click two buttons and next, next, next, finish.The most valuable feature would be the ability to plug into the data feeds that we have and pull information from physical hardware as well as the virtual layer. The best feature is the visualization of what's going on, so we can take a very quick look and see if there are any issues that stand out.

Read more »

Cons
The improvement I would like to see is not one thing particular to CloudCenter. I'd say it's more of a message that the system is still using a lot of the different products and if they would all just fit better together, they all could be faster together.

Read more »

Certificate Management should be simplified for non-technical staff members.They can change the interface for the 6.7 vSphere that would make it more simple and more friendly. I think changing the interface of the operations manager would be good. It's friendly to use right now but it would simplify it more.The whole interface is like an information overload, it just bombards me with messages, warnings, and alerts. When I follow through on the majority of these messages, I realize that I'm really just wasting time because they're not really real problems.With our environment right now, stability is the one sticking point. There hasn't been a great deal of handholding in between the different versions, so we've run into problems with there being what I would call "more than just the average change between versions" and it's caused a loss of data for us in the past.Technical support is good, once you pass the first level.I know that they talk a lot about AI and a sort of forecasting ahead of time. It's a good application, but it has to wait for a certain period of time to actually do an analysis. If it would give you that ahead of time, or even forecasting, it would be really improved.When you are at your lowest, support is pretty bad. They ask you dumb questions but when you come to second and upper service desk, it is much easier and much better to talk to and resolve the issue.As they're able to add in more vendors for hardware to be able to pull information from different firewalls, switches, or other vendors, I would like to see where we can get more of a complete view of what's going on in the network. That would make this solution better.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The initial costs are a bit on the higher side but the licensing is flexible.We did an enterprise license agreement with our VMware partner and put this in our bundle. We tried it and loved it, so we use it now.I have reduced the time to troubleshoot for my customers.We would like to build custom dashboards in the standard license. Right now, this is available in the enterprise license, not the standard license.We have seen good ROI results. It has made our lives easier.Our budgets are always tight. We would like to have more features at lower licensing levels for easier access to them.We have seen huge ROI. It has certainly reduced troubleshooting.If the VMs were trimmed, then we wouldn't have to buy as much software/hardware, and this means less licenses. While most of it is VMware licenses, which are relatively cheap, there are SQL licenses for Microsoft, and this is where we could start saving a lot of money.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
6th
out of 57 in Cloud Management
Views
4,638
Comparisons
3,211
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
2,750
Avg. Rating
8.0
1st
out of 57 in Cloud Management
Views
24,082
Comparisons
10,325
Reviews
117
Average Words per Review
526
Avg. Rating
8.4
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
CliQr, CliQr CloudCentervCenter Operations Manager, VCOPS, vRealize Operations
Learn
Cisco
VMware
Overview

The Cisco CloudCenter solution is an application-centric hybrid cloud management platform that securely provisions infrastructure resources and deploys applications to data center, private cloud, and public cloud environments.

With Cisco CloudCenter breakthrough application-centric technology, users
can:

  • Model: Quickly and easily build a cloud-independent application profile that defines the deployment and management requirements of an entire application stack.
  • Deploy: Use one click to deploy the application profile and related components and data to any data center or cloud environment.
  • Manage: Apply a wide range of application lifecycle actions to set policies to enable in-place scaling, support cross-environment bursting or high availability and disaster recovery, and stop the deployment.

Automate IT operations management, manage performance and gain visibility across physical and virtual infrastructure with VMware vROps. It proactively identifies and solves emerging issues with predictive analytics and smart alerts, ensuring optimum performance and availability of applications and infrastructures across vSphere, Hyper-V, Amazon and physical hardware.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco CloudCenter
Learn more about VMware vRealize Operations (vROps)
Sample Customers
NTT, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), CollabNet, Pratt & Miller, PZFlexScience Applications International Corporation, Tribune Media, Heartland Payment Systems, Telkom Indonesia, Columbia Sportswear, iGATE, CSS Corp, Angel Broking, Adira Finance, Hipskind, Beiersdorf Shared Services, Innovate Mas Indonesia, Adobe, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi , Join Experience S.A, Borusan Holdings, Department of Transport - Abu Dhabi
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider37%
Software R&D Company21%
Government12%
Media Company6%
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Financial Services Firm14%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Comms Service Provider6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company32%
Comms Service Provider11%
Healthcare Company6%
University6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise72%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise70%
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Turbonomic, Apache and others in Cloud Management. Updated: December 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email