"The scalability is one of the best."
"The stability of the solution is very good."
"One of the most valuable features is the ability to report on questionable activity."
"The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions."
"We don't always know what the configurations are all about. They change the configuration possibilities all of the time and we don't always get the same results."
"It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations. For example, if I were to set a rule that is a deviation from the pre-defined rules in the Microsoft product, there's conflict."
"There are occasions where it generates some false positives and you have to embark into figuring it out. You need to find out if it was a true alert or a false positive. It's a little bit cumbersome in that area."
"Some of the newer features are not completely there yet... For example, there's a tool that allows you to grade your overall internal security and I don't feel that it's completely accurate."
Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in User Activity Monitoring while Microsoft ATA [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in User Activity Monitoring. Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] is rated 6.0, while Microsoft ATA [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] writes "Good for IoT devices and occupation-calculations, but there are issues with stability and it is not user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft ATA [EOL] writes "Easy to define rules but interface needs better granularity and only integrates well with other Microsoft solutions". Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Microsoft ATA [EOL] is most compared with .
We monitor all User Activity Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
