We performed a comparison between Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics and Cisco NGIPS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)."The most valuable feature of Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics is its reliability."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its modularity, so whenever you need to upgrade or add another service, you don't need to buy another box."
"The URL filtering feature and the new locations feature are both valuable additions to the solution."
"Cisco NGIPS is a stable tool...The technical support provided by Cisco NGIPS is okay."
"We primarily use this solution as an application filter and for IPS."
"The most valuable feature is its IPS ability. You are able to balance security and connectivity."
"Among all the different solutions I have worked with, such as Palo Alto many other firewalls. Cisco has the support, documentation, and design. The documentation is widely available and it can help you a lot with implementation. It makes the implementation much easier."
"The tracking intelligence feature is very good. This solution provides us with the opportunity to detect threats in real-time."
"The solution is very powerful coupled with Firepower."
"Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics could improve by having quicker detection and response and web analysis."
"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The pricing is very expensive. They should make their equipment more affordable."
"The feedback from some of our customers is that they weren't interested in Cisco because it was too complicated to deploy, especially in cloud-related areas."
"The solution requires better management. When it comes to central management capabilities, improvements can be made."
"Cisco NGIPS should work on its shortcomings related to the issues that stem from bugs and performance."
"I would recommend this solution to others for medium, large, and enterprise businesses only."
"Multi-internet line load balancing should be supported."
"The initial setup is a bit complex because it requires a lot of configuration, firewall and zoning."
More Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics is ranked 23rd in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 1 review while Cisco NGIPS is ranked 5th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 62 reviews. Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics is rated 10.0, while Cisco NGIPS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics writes "Simple deployment, reliable, and helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco NGIPS writes "Very effective for malware and signature-based anomalies but stability needs improvement". Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics is most compared with Cisco Secure Network Analytics, whereas Cisco NGIPS is most compared with Check Point IPS, Fortinet FortiGate IPS, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention.
See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.