Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] vs Fortscale comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In User Activity Monitoring
9th
Views
16
Comparisons
12
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco Connected Mobile Experiences, Cisco Connected Mobile Experiences Analytics, CMX Analytics
Fortscale UEBA for SOC
Learn More
Overview

Use the intelligence in your wireless network. View location information, dwell times, and analytics to learn how visitors behave on site. 

Fortscale delivers the intelligence needed to detect risks posed by different users and entities, so critical resources can be protected and appropriate controls implemented to improve an organization’s security stance. Unlike other solutions that rely on predefined rules, Fortscale combines predictive, big data analytics with advanced machine learning to accurately uncover real-time security risks. There are no limits – with selftuning anomaly detection that accurately identifies risks in an organization’s unique environment, security analysts have all they need to quickly identify and shut down attacks.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Cisco, Zurich, Platech

Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in User Activity Monitoring while Fortscale is ranked 9th in User Activity Monitoring. Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] is rated 6.0, while Fortscale is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] writes "Good for IoT devices and occupation-calculations, but there are issues with stability and it is not user-friendly". On the other hand, Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Fortscale is most compared with .

See our list of best User Activity Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all User Activity Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.