Cisco Container Platform vs Google Container Engine comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
667 views|481 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Google Logo
115 views|88 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Container Platform and Google Container Engine based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is definitely the fact that you can use a single platform to deploy to different resource providers. Right now, the version I'm using has vSphere and AWS, but I know in the future they're planning on adding more. The ability to deploy clusters on-prem or to any number of public cloud providers is really valuable because you don't need to relearn or switch platforms to switch resource providers."

More Cisco Container Platform Pros →

"The tool is very powerful, scalable, and easy to manage. Its autoscaling features helped us save costs."

More Google Container Engine Pros →

Cons
"One thing that is a little bit annoying about Cisco Container Platform is that for each cluster you create you have to go through the same web form each time. If you're creating two identical clusters, you still have to go through that web form twice."

More Cisco Container Platform Cons →

"Google Container Engine needs to be able to manage network products."

More Google Container Engine Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The tool is very powerful, scalable, and easy to manage. Its autoscaling features helped us save costs.
Top Answer:Google Container Engine needs to be able to manage network products.
Ranking
20th
Views
667
Comparisons
481
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
14th
Views
115
Comparisons
88
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
211
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco CCP
Learn More
Overview

Cisco Container Platform is a fully curated, lightweight container management platform for production grade environments, powered by Kubernetes, and delivered with Cisco enterprise-class support. It reduces the complexity of configuring, deploying, securing, scaling and managing containers via automation coupled with Cisco’s best practices for security and networking. Cisco Container Platform is built with an open architecture using open source components, so you're not locked in to any single vendor. It works across both on-premises and public cloud environments. And because it’s optimized with Cisco HyperFlex, this preconfigured, integrated solution sets up in minutes.

Google Container Engine is a powerful cluster manager and orchestration system for running your Docker containers. Container Engine schedules your containers into the cluster and manages them automatically based on requirements you define (such as CPU and memory). It's built on the open source Kubernetes system, giving you the flexibility to take advantage of on-premises, hybrid, or public cloud infrastructure.

Sample Customers
Clemson University
Tock
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Insurance Company9%
Comms Service Provider8%
Financial Services Firm6%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise72%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Container Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco Container Platform is ranked 20th in Container Management while Google Container Engine is ranked 14th in Container Management with 1 review. Cisco Container Platform is rated 8.0, while Google Container Engine is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Container Platform writes "Enables the deployment/management of Kubernetes clusters from multiple resource providers at one location". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Container Engine writes "Has autoscaling features that helps to save costs ". Cisco Container Platform is most compared with Kubernetes, OpenShift Container Platform and VMware Tanzu Mission Control, whereas Google Container Engine is most compared with .

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.