Cisco Container Platform vs Gravity [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
667 views|481 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Teleport Logo
views| comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Container Platform and Gravity [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
20th
Views
667
Comparisons
481
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Container Management
Buyer's Guide
Container Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco CCP
Learn More
Overview

Cisco Container Platform is a fully curated, lightweight container management platform for production grade environments, powered by Kubernetes, and delivered with Cisco enterprise-class support. It reduces the complexity of configuring, deploying, securing, scaling and managing containers via automation coupled with Cisco’s best practices for security and networking. Cisco Container Platform is built with an open architecture using open source components, so you're not locked in to any single vendor. It works across both on-premises and public cloud environments. And because it’s optimized with Cisco HyperFlex, this preconfigured, integrated solution sets up in minutes.

Gravity is an application delivery system that lets engineers deliver and run cloud-native applications in regulated, restricted, or remote environments without added complexity. Make cloud-native applications work in any Linux environment, even air-gapped data centers or edge devices. Meet strict security and access requirements while retaining benefits of cloud-native software. Deliver solutions faster and avoid vendor lock-in with applications that can be installed and operated the same way in any environment.

Sample Customers
Clemson University
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Insurance Company9%
Government8%
Comms Service Provider8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Container Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco Container Platform is ranked 20th in Container Management while Gravity [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Container Management. Cisco Container Platform is rated 8.0, while Gravity [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Container Platform writes "Enables the deployment/management of Kubernetes clusters from multiple resource providers at one location". On the other hand, Cisco Container Platform is most compared with Kubernetes, OpenShift Container Platform and VMware Tanzu Mission Control, whereas Gravity [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.