We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Cisco Container Platform vs. Kubernetes

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Kubernetes, Red Hat, VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: November 2021.
555,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is definitely the fact that you can use a single platform to deploy to different resource providers. Right now, the version I'm using has vSphere and AWS, but I know in the future they're planning on adding more. The ability to deploy clusters on-prem or to any number of public cloud providers is really valuable because you don't need to relearn or switch platforms to switch resource providers."

More Cisco Container Platform Pros »

"The product is highly scalable.""I like that it has really boosted cloud-native development and stood the test of time. The underlying architecture allows one to scale as per the business KPIs much faster.""It is a very good solution for deploying microservices in an application. It has a lot of freedom in it, which makes it very interesting. It is also web-enabled. You can run services in other virtual applications and virtual machines.""I like the replication center and the configuration.""This product has a rich toolset from the community including CNI plug-ins, Helm packages, operators, dashboards, various integrations, etc.""I like that it gives you all the flexibility, for example, auto-scaling. Everything is figured out exactly right. It manages all your workloads without much intervention. It can scale in, scale out, and with security. Everything looks pretty good compared to the old legacy way of working.""Kubernetes' integration with AWS Lambda is great. I barely had to write any code to connect from EKS to Lambda, so Kubernetes is programmer friendly.""The solution is easy to use."

More Kubernetes Pros »

Cons
"One thing that is a little bit annoying about Cisco Container Platform is that for each cluster you create you have to go through the same web form each time. If you're creating two identical clusters, you still have to go through that web form twice."

More Cisco Container Platform Cons »

"Setup was not straightforward.""It would be very interesting if they could introduce a template engine to set dynamic values in the deployment time. It would be ideal if it could be native in Kubernetes as it would be much easier.""The Kubernetes dashboard can be improved. It is currently a mess. We were using Rancher earlier, and everyone was happy with the dashboard. Right now, we are using Kubernetes, and it's not working with Microsoft workstations. We still have problems with the dashboard. It's terrible.""Lacks some scalability and more user-friendly operability.""They need to focus on more security internally.""They should update Kubernetes more regularly.""It would be useful to have a basic and stable interface for monitoring and quick deployment purposes, especially when the deployments are big like a proof of concept or proof of technology. Currently, you need to use the Kubernetes console for all functionalities. It is not a quick-to-learn product if you are not from a Linux background. You need to be very skilled at Linux to learn it quickly. It took me two to three months because I mostly work with Microsoft products. For people who are not from a Linux background, the learning curve is a little bit longer.""It's complex to manage and requires specialists."

More Kubernetes Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"There is no licensing fee.""The management layer is free, which is perfect. You don't need to pay money for the management layer, but in AWS develop service, you need to pay. I think it is €75 per month for the management layer. It is free here, so you can have as many Kubernetes clusters as you need. You are paying just for the workload, that is, for the machine, CPU, memory, and everything.""Kubernetes is open source. But we have to manage Kubernetes as a team, and the overhead is a bit high. Compared with the platforms like Cloud Foundry, which has a much less operational overhead. Kubernetes, I have to manage the code, and I have to hire the developers. If someone has a product, a developer should know exactly what he's writing or high availability, and all those things may differ the costs.""The solution requires a license to use it.""The solution is affordable.""Kubernetes is open-source.""Google Kubernetes Engine is free in the simplest setup, AWS Kubernetes Engine costs about $50 (depending on the region), in a three master setup, so it's almost the same as the cost of the EC2 instances and it's totally fine from my point of view.""There are no licensing fees."

More Kubernetes Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
555,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The product is highly scalable.
Top Answer: Even though the solution is open-source, one major service we need to pay for is storage. Normally we are using the storage from EMC or NetApps or IBM. These companies created their own stack of… more »
Top Answer: There are a lot of complexities. They're a lot of components that are working together internally. If you look into the installation methods nowadays, it's better, however, previously, it was a very… more »
Ranking
7th
Views
1,476
Comparisons
960
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
2,263
Rating
8.0
1st
Views
1,972
Comparisons
1,520
Reviews
25
Average Words per Review
571
Rating
8.6
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco CCP
K8
Learn More
Overview

Cisco Container Platform is a fully curated, lightweight container management platform for production grade environments, powered by Kubernetes, and delivered with Cisco enterprise-class support. It reduces the complexity of configuring, deploying, securing, scaling and managing containers via automation coupled with Cisco’s best practices for security and networking. Cisco Container Platform is built with an open architecture using open source components, so you're not locked in to any single vendor. It works across both on-premises and public cloud environments. And because it’s optimized with Cisco HyperFlex, this preconfigured, integrated solution sets up in minutes.

Kubernetes (K8s) is an open-source system for automating deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications.
It groups containers that make up an application into logical units for easy management and discovery. Kubernetes builds upon 15 years of experience of running production workloads at Google, combined with best-of-breed ideas and practices from the community.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Container Platform
Learn more about Kubernetes
Sample Customers
Clemson University
China unicom, NetEase Cloud, Nav, AppDirect
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider48%
Computer Software Company22%
Government3%
Media Company3%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm21%
Computer Software Company14%
Government14%
Comms Service Provider14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider21%
Government8%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise56%
Find out what your peers are saying about Kubernetes, Red Hat, VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: November 2021.
555,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco Container Platform is ranked 7th in Container Management with 1 review while Kubernetes is ranked 1st in Container Management with 25 reviews. Cisco Container Platform is rated 8.0, while Kubernetes is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Container Platform writes "Enables the deployment/management of Kubernetes clusters from multiple resource providers at one location". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kubernetes writes "Offers security, scalability, and high availability". Cisco Container Platform is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Rancher Labs and HPE Ezmeral Container Platform, whereas Kubernetes is most compared with VMware Tanzu Build Service, Nutanix Karbon, HashiCorp Nomad, VMware Tanzu Mission Control and OpenShift Container Platform.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.