We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Cisco Container Platform vs. OpenShift Container Platform

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Kubernetes, Red Hat, Rancher Labs and others in Container Management. Updated: October 2021.
542,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is definitely the fact that you can use a single platform to deploy to different resource providers. Right now, the version I'm using has vSphere and AWS, but I know in the future they're planning on adding more. The ability to deploy clusters on-prem or to any number of public cloud providers is really valuable because you don't need to relearn or switch platforms to switch resource providers."

More Cisco Container Platform Pros »

"The auto scalability feature, which is based on smart agendas, determined from pre-prepared rules is the most valuable feature. You can also create different routes for deployment. Deployment types can be provided with an identifier, such as an ARB deployment. This really helped in rolling out releases without disrupting services for the end-users.""Openshift is a very developer-friendly product.""Red Hat's security throughout the stack and software supply chain is good. It is a lightweight operating system. You don't have to worry about the security patches on the system. You can update the entire environment with security patches, which is a nice feature.""Some of the primary features we leverage in the platform have to do with how we manage the cluster configurations, the properties, and the auto-scalability. These are the features that definitely provide value in terms of reducing overhead for the developers."

More OpenShift Container Platform Pros »

Cons
"One thing that is a little bit annoying about Cisco Container Platform is that for each cluster you create you have to go through the same web form each time. If you're creating two identical clusters, you still have to go through that web form twice."

More Cisco Container Platform Cons »

"From a networking perspective, the routing capability can be matured further. OpenShift doesn't handle restrictions on what kind of IPs are allowed, who can access them, and who cannot access them. So it is a simple matter of just using it with adequate network access, at the network level.""The solution needs to introduce open ID connect integration for role-based access control.""It has an option to install OpenShift without connecting it to the Internet. We tried this, but it was very hard. We couldn't manage to use that option. We wanted to use it offline for installations, updates, upgrades, etc., but we didn't find the offline installation and updates easy. This could be better.""With the recent trend of cloud-native, fully managed serverless services, I don't see much documentation about how a customer should move from on-prem to the cloud, or what is the best way to do a lift-and-shift. Even if you are on AWS OCP, which is self-managed infra services, and you want to use the ROSA managed services, what is the best way to achieve that migration? I don't see documentation for these kinds of use cases from Red Hat."

More OpenShift Container Platform Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"OpenShift with Red Hat support is pretty costly. We have done a comparison between AWS EKS (Elastic Kubernetes Services) which provides fully managed services from AWS. It's built on open-source-based Kubernetes clusters and it is much cheaper compared to Red Hat, but it is a little expensive compared to ECS provided by AWS."

More OpenShift Container Platform Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
542,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Red Hat Openshift is ideal for organizations using microservices and cloud environments. I like that the platform is auto-scalable, which saves overhead time for developers. I think Openshift can be a… more »
Top Answer: Red Hat's security throughout the stack and software supply chain is good. It is a lightweight operating system. You don't have to worry about the security patches on the system. You can update the… more »
Top Answer: The solution is very costly. However, you do get good value for the price, and therefore we're willing to pay even if the cost is high.
Ranking
7th
Views
1,460
Comparisons
942
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
2,263
Rating
8.0
2nd
Views
7,204
Comparisons
6,455
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
1,248
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco CCP
Learn More
Overview

Cisco Container Platform is a fully curated, lightweight container management platform for production grade environments, powered by Kubernetes, and delivered with Cisco enterprise-class support. It reduces the complexity of configuring, deploying, securing, scaling and managing containers via automation coupled with Cisco’s best practices for security and networking. Cisco Container Platform is built with an open architecture using open source components, so you're not locked in to any single vendor. It works across both on-premises and public cloud environments. And because it’s optimized with Cisco HyperFlex, this preconfigured, integrated solution sets up in minutes.

Red Hat® OpenShift® offers a consistent hybrid cloud foundation for building and scaling containerized applications. Benefit from streamlined platform installation and upgrades from one of the enterprise Kubernetes leaders.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Container Platform
Learn more about OpenShift Container Platform
Sample Customers
Clemson University
Edenor, BMW, Ford, Argentine Ministry of Health
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider48%
Computer Software Company21%
Media Company3%
Government3%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Kubernetes, Red Hat, Rancher Labs and others in Container Management. Updated: October 2021.
542,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco Container Platform is ranked 7th in Container Management with 1 review while OpenShift Container Platform is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 4 reviews. Cisco Container Platform is rated 8.0, while OpenShift Container Platform is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Container Platform writes "Enables the deployment/management of Kubernetes clusters from multiple resource providers at one location". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenShift Container Platform writes "Completely removes overhead for our developers in terms of managing orchestration of Kubernetes clusters". Cisco Container Platform is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Rancher Labs and HPE Ezmeral Container Platform, whereas OpenShift Container Platform is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Karbon, Amazon EKS, Rancher Labs and VMware Tanzu Build Service.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.