Cisco Data Center Network Manager vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Data Center Network Manager and Kaseya Traverse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Data Center Network Manager vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."

More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pros →

"I like that is easy to work on and straightforward.""Automation of the ILS.""VCNM provides a unique capability of managing the admin VDCs of Nexus boxes.""The product has excellent stability.""The product makes the management of our environment simpler.""We use the product to manage access points.""After installation, you almost forget that it is working.""The most valuable feature is the connectivity monitoring."

More Cisco Data Center Network Manager Pros →

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution.""Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap.""We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud.""It's a simple and humble tool.""Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly.""The remote support and data collection features are great.""Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."

More Kaseya Traverse Pros →

Cons
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."

More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Cons →

"In the next release, I would like to see it merged with Prime and I think that it should be more unified.""Data Center Network Manager is a little complex because it includes a lot of hardware to be installed.""The configuration is too complicated and you have to create templates and use a lot of menus.""The reporting is not very intuitive and has room for improvement.""API lacks robustness.""It is not very easy to monitor or to browse.""We need better performance and reliability.""Automation for the RMA process can be added."

More Cisco Data Center Network Manager Cons →

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product.""Reporting is a bit difficult.""The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently.""Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us.""Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect.""Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also.""In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

More Kaseya Traverse Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The solution is very expensive."
  • "The product is licensed with contracts that work on a yearly basis rather than a monthly model."
  • "On average, Data Center Network Manager's pricing isn't too costly unless you choose a premier license."
  • "When we purchase a Nexus box, the MDS CM license comes with it."
  • "The price of Cisco Data Center Network Manager is expensive compared to other vendors on the market."
  • "I would say that the pricing offers great value for the money."
  • "We usually opt for a yearly plan, commonly for three or five years upfront. Some customers may not utilize all the features included in the product, and this can lead to them paying for functionalities they don't need."
  • More Cisco Data Center Network Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."
  • "The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."
  • More Kaseya Traverse Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points.
    Top Answer:The product is not expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:The Wi-Fi side needs improvement. In most warehouse environments, there are shortfalls in such conditions. We often face… more »
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is the consolidated dashboard, providing insights into parameters and overall usage of… more »
    Top Answer:We usually opt for a yearly plan, commonly for three or five years upfront. Some customers may not utilize all the… more »
    Top Answer:The tool's pricing strategy could be improved to compete more effectively in the market, especially against competitors… more »
    Top Answer:The remote support and data collection features are great.
    Top Answer:The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees… more »
    Top Answer:Reporting is a bit difficult. It’s very cumbersome to set up new reports.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Data Center Network Manager
    Learn More
    Overview

    Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is a comprehensive network analytics solution that provides organizations with valuable insights into their network performance and user experience. The primary use case of this product is to enable IT teams to proactively monitor, troubleshoot, and optimize their network infrastructure.

    The most valuable functionality of Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is its AI-driven insights and recommendations. Leveraging machine learning algorithms, it analyzes vast amounts of network data to identify anomalies, predict potential issues, and suggest remediation actions. This proactive approach helps organizations minimize network downtime, improve user experience, and optimize network performance.

    By providing real-time visibility into network performance, Juniper Mist Premium Analytics helps organizations quickly identify and resolve network issues. It offers detailed analytics on network traffic, application performance, and user behavior, allowing IT teams to pinpoint the root cause of problems and take immediate action. This not only reduces troubleshooting time but also enhances overall network reliability.

    Furthermore, Juniper Mist Premium Analytics enables organizations to optimize their network infrastructure. It provides insights into network capacity utilization, application usage patterns, and user behavior, allowing IT teams to make informed decisions about network design, resource allocation, and capacity planning. This helps organizations to ensure that their network is efficiently utilized and can support the growing demands of their users.

    Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) is designed to help you efficiently implement, visualize, and manage Cisco Unified Fabric. It includes a comprehensive feature set, along with a customizable dashboard that provides enhanced visibility and automated fabric provisioning of dynamic data centers.

    Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Banco de Guayaquil, Cox Communications, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Roper St. Francis, University of British Columbia
    UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider27%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Pharma/Biotech Company9%
    Insurance Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company34%
    Retailer9%
    Government8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Large Enterprise100%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise35%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cisco Data Center Network Manager vs. Kaseya Traverse
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Data Center Network Manager vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Data Center Network Manager is ranked 27th in Network Monitoring Software with 19 reviews while Kaseya Traverse is ranked 65th in Network Monitoring Software with 7 reviews. Cisco Data Center Network Manager is rated 7.8, while Kaseya Traverse is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Cisco Data Center Network Manager writes "Provides insight into the network's health data and has an excellent support team". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaseya Traverse writes "A stable network monitoring tool requiring an easy initial setup phase". Cisco Data Center Network Manager is most compared with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant, Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor and SolarWinds NPM, whereas Kaseya Traverse is most compared with LogicMonitor, Auvik Network Management (ANM), PRTG Network Monitor and SolarWinds NPM. See our Cisco Data Center Network Manager vs. Kaseya Traverse report.

    See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

    We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.