• Home
  • Cisco Elastic Services Controller vs. ECI Mercury [EOL]

Cisco Elastic Services Controller vs ECI Mercury [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Network Virtualization
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Elastic Services Controller and ECI Mercury [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Array Networks and others in Network Virtualization.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Virtualization Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
5th
out of 7 in Network Virtualization
Views
35
Comparisons
13
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Network Virtualization
Buyer's Guide
Network Virtualization
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Array Networks and others in Network Virtualization. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco ESC
ECI Mercury NFV, ECI Mercury Network Functions Virtualization
Learn More
Cisco
Video Not Available
Ribbon Communications
Overview

Business success is increasingly dictated by agility: the ability to respond quickly to change, bring new services to market quickly, and do all of this within an environment that is simple and inexpensive to operate. The Cisco Elastic Services Controller (ESC) promotes agility, flexibility, and programmability in network functions virtualization (NFV) environments and offers comprehensive automated lifecycle management capabilities. By design, Cisco ESC is built as an open and modular system. It provides a single point of control to manage all aspects of NFV lifecycle for virtual network functions (VNFs) in a dynamic environment. Drawing on industry standards and open APIs, you can control the full lifecycle of all of your virtualized resources, whether using Cisco or third-party VNFs, allowing you to choose best-in-class industry solutions.

Providing end-users with the best low-latency experience, Mercury excels at deploying virtualized network functions at the mobile edge, at the customer premises, and in the network as an edge cloud. Mercury NFV platforms ensure that your network is always ready to respond quickly to new customer service opportunities.

Buyer's Guide
Network Virtualization
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Array Networks and others in Network Virtualization. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco Elastic Services Controller is ranked 5th in Network Virtualization while ECI Mercury [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Virtualization. Cisco Elastic Services Controller is rated 0.0, while ECI Mercury [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Cisco Elastic Services Controller is most compared with , whereas ECI Mercury [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Network Virtualization vendors.

We monitor all Network Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.