Compare Cisco Email Security (ESA) vs. FireEye Email Security

Cisco Email Security (ESA) is ranked 1st in Messaging Security with 16 reviews while FireEye Email Security is ranked 20th in Messaging Security. Cisco Email Security (ESA) is rated 8.6, while FireEye Email Security is rated 0. The top reviewer of Cisco Email Security (ESA) writes "Black-listing and white-listing are highly intuitive and easy to do". On the other hand, Cisco Email Security (ESA) is most compared with Fortinet FortiMail, Proofpoint Email Protection and FireEye Email Security, whereas FireEye Email Security is most compared with Cisco Email Security (ESA), Forcepoint Email Security and DMARC Compass.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use FireEye Email Security? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Barracuda Networks and others in Messaging Security. Updated: September 2019.
370,827 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
It is not that costly. We pay for the solution through a contractor and pay an annual fee.We were using Proofpoint and then we switched to Cisco... reportability was one of the main reasons we switched, but the biggest one was cost. If you can get an equivalent functionality for a better price it's wise to do so. That's what our primary decision came down to: We could get equivalent functionality at a lower price point.There were no other costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.The license was not per user, the license model was per feature. You could choose anti-virus, anti-spam, etc. It was feature-based and charged yearly.Licensing costs depend on how many users there are. It could range between $5 and $7 per month, per user.Pricing depends on your environment and which model you want to buy.In addition to the standard licensing, there is a cost for SMARTnet as well.We do annual licensing for ESA and SMA together, and possibly SmartNet support. Packaged together, the cost is just under $38,000.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Messaging Security solutions are best for your needs.
370,827 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
1st
out of 43 in Messaging Security
Views
9,157
Comparisons
5,774
Reviews
15
Average Words per Review
840
Avg. Rating
8.7
20th
out of 43 in Messaging Security
Views
524
Comparisons
443
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
IronPort, Cisco Email Security
Learn
Cisco
FireEye
Overview

Customers of all sizes face the same daunting challenge: email is simultaneously the most important business communication tool and the leading attack vector for security breaches. Cisco Email Security enables users to communicate securely and helps organizations combat Business Email Compromise (BEC), ransomware, advanced malware, phishing, spam, and data loss with a multilayered approach to security.

FireEye Email Security delivers dynamic defense to detect attacks from the very first time they're seen and blocks the most dangerous cyber threats including malware-laden attachments and URLs, credential phishing sites and business email compromise attacks. Email-borne cyber attacks are targeted, automated and hidden amongst millions of messages, easily morphing before signatures can be created.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Email Security (ESA)
Learn more about FireEye Email Security
Sample Customers
SUNY Old Westbury, CoxHealth, City of Fullerton, IndraNorthshore Utility District, Luz Technologies, Air Academy Federal Credit Union, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, State of Missouri, City and County of San Francisco, Denver Public Schools, Vodafone, Go Auto, Stater Bros. Market
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company29%
Manufacturing Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
Legal Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Energy/Utilities Company37%
Comms Service Provider16%
Software R&D Company14%
Manufacturing Company5%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise50%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise76%
Large Enterprise14%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Barracuda Networks and others in Messaging Security. Updated: September 2019.
370,827 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Messaging Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email