• Home
  • Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization vs. ECI Mercury [EOL]

Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization vs ECI Mercury [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Network Virtualization
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization and ECI Mercury [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Array Networks and others in Network Virtualization.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Virtualization Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Majdi Sabbah
Versatile, offering flexibility and scalability
Use ECI Mercury [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is a separate charge for support."
  • "Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization is an expensive solution."

    • More Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualiza...
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is its user-friendly management dashboard.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Enterprise ...
    Top Answer:Like any Cisco product, Cisco Enterprise NFV is on the expensive side.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualiza...
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in enhancing compatibility with other solutions and vendors. Better integration capabilities could provide more value, especially in scenarios where a mix of solutions is… more »
    Read all 6 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 7 in Network Virtualization
    Views
    154
    Comparisons
    49
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    261
    Rating
    8.3
    Unranked
    In Network Virtualization
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cisco NFV
    ECI Mercury NFV, ECI Mercury Network Functions Virtualization
    Learn More
    Cisco
    Ribbon Communications
    Overview

    Simplify operations and roll out new virtual network services in minutes on any platform.

    Providing end-users with the best low-latency experience, Mercury excels at deploying virtualized network functions at the mobile edge, at the customer premises, and in the network as an edge cloud. Mercury NFV platforms ensure that your network is always ready to respond quickly to new customer service opportunities.

    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise29%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Virtualization
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Array Networks and others in Network Virtualization. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization is ranked 3rd in Network Virtualization with 6 reviews while ECI Mercury [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Virtualization. Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization is rated 7.8, while ECI Mercury [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization writes "Versatile, offering flexibility and scalability". On the other hand, Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization is most compared with , whereas ECI Mercury [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Network Virtualization vendors.

    We monitor all Network Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.