We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"There is a separate charge for support."
Simplify operations and roll out new virtual network services in minutes on any platform.
Providing end-users with the best low-latency experience, Mercury excels at deploying virtualized network functions at the mobile edge, at the customer premises, and in the network as an edge cloud. Mercury NFV platforms ensure that your network is always ready to respond quickly to new customer service opportunities.
Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization is ranked 3rd in Network Virtualization with 3 reviews while ECI Mercury is ranked 5th in Network Virtualization. Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization is rated 7.4, while ECI Mercury is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization writes "Easy to setup, maintain and manage, but very expensive". On the other hand, Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization is most compared with , whereas ECI Mercury is most compared with Cisco ACI.
See our list of best Network Virtualization vendors.
We monitor all Network Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.