Compare Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization vs. Sangfor aBOS

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
534,299 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
3rd
Views
69
Comparisons
13
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
291
Rating
7.5
6th
Views
115
Comparisons
47
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco NFV
aBOS
Learn More
Overview

Simplify operations and roll out new virtual network services in minutes on any platform.

In reality, branch offices face IT obstacles such as lack of specialized IT personnel and physical space and power resources needed to support traditional datacenter platforms. They expect to be more productive to meet the increasing business needs; they want to be able to quickly set up a light data center and achieve rapid gateway deployment in order to fulfill requirements like securing operating systems, providing fast access and enabling remote office, etc. Sangfor aBOS (the Mini HCI) is specifically designed to cater to this demand. With virtualization technology, it only takes one server to provide Network Function Virtualization (NFV), virtual switch, virtual router and other virtual services through a unified management platform for resource allocation. Inheriting Sangfor’s strength in security and optimization, NFV allows users to deploy vIAM, vAF, vWANO, vSSL and etc. according to their needs.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization
Learn more about Sangfor aBOS
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Sekolah Seri Puteri (SSP), Wisma MUIS
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Cisco, Masergy and others in Network Virtualization. Updated: September 2021.
534,299 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization is ranked 3rd in Network Virtualization with 3 reviews while Sangfor aBOS is ranked 6th in Network Virtualization. Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization is rated 7.4, while Sangfor aBOS is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization writes "Easy to setup, maintain and manage, but very expensive". On the other hand, Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization is most compared with , whereas Sangfor aBOS is most compared with VMware NSX.

See our list of best Network Virtualization vendors.

We monitor all Network Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.