• Home
  • Cisco FabricPath vs. IBM BNT

Cisco FabricPath vs IBM BNT comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo

Cisco FabricPath

Read 22 Cisco FabricPath reviews
543 views|296 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
IBM Logo

IBM BNT

27 views|19 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
LAN Switching
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco FabricPath and IBM BNT based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies and others in LAN Switching.
To learn more, read our detailed LAN Switching Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Daniel Kivuthi
They don't malfunction, and the switching capacity is good.
FabricPath switches are reliable and simple to maintain. Once you install one, it's generally good. They don't malfunction, and the switching... Read more →
Use IBM BNT?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing for this product is good."
  • "The price of Cisco FabricPath could be reduced, it is expensive in the market here in Sri Lanka. The solution is subscriptions based, if the customer wants any future integrations, or if there are any future enhancements they will have to pay. There are different license options available, such as one or three years purchases."
  • "FabricPath is very reasonably priced."
  • "The solution falls under the pricier category, but it provides value for the price charged."
  • "It is very expensive."
  • "I rate the product's pricing a ten out of ten. Cisco switches cost around 15,000 dollars, and DNS licenses cost around 25,000 dollars. The total amount is 45,000 dollars, which is too expensive."

    • More Cisco FabricPath Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Cisco FabricPath?
    Top Answer:As I mentioned earlier, the durability, flexibility, and security of Cisco devices are notable. Particularly with switches, the capability to implement multiple VLANs and easily aggregate the network… more »
    Read all 18 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco FabricPath?
    Top Answer:It is very expensive.
    Read all 13 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Cisco FabricPath?
    Top Answer:In terms of the series, I find that the integration with other teleconferencing applications needs to be more seamless. I have suggested to Cisco that the endpoint device should allow joining calls… more »
    Read all 18 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    8th
    out of 16 in LAN Switching
    Views
    543
    Comparisons
    296
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    335
    Rating
    8.3
    15th
    out of 16 in LAN Switching
    Views
    27
    Comparisons
    19
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    FabricPath
    BNT
    Learn More
    Cisco
    IBM
    Overview
    Cisco FabricPath is a Cisco NX-OS software innovation combining the plug-and-play simplicity of Ethernet with the reliability and scalability of Layer 3 routing. Using FabricPath, you can build highly scalable Layer 2 multipath networks without the Spanning Tree Protocol. Such networks are particularly suitable for large virtualization deployments, private clouds, and high-performance computing (HPC) environments. The benefits of Cisco FabricPath include: Minimal commands per switch ease configuration and operation, Autodiscovery simplifies addition of new links and switches, Provision additional network bandwidth without impacting network, Supports one-, two-, or three-tier architectures, VLAN extensibility across the data center.
    IBM BNT RackSwitch G8264R Model 64C Browser-Based Interface, has forty-eight 10 Gb SFP+ ports and four 40 Gb QSFP+ ports, four 40 Gb QSFP+ ports that can each be converted to four 10 Gb SFP+ ports with optional breakout cable. redundant hot-swappable power supplies and fans. rack front-to-rear airflow, and latency of less than 850 nanoseconds. The BLADEOS Browser-Based Interface (BBI) software is included with the RackSwitch G8264 (G8264). The BBI software lets you use your Web browser to access switch information and statistics, and to perform switch configuration via the Internet.
    Sample Customers
    Bellevue, Calligaris, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Management Science Associates, Multi-Customer, Oediv, Roper St. Francis, SNAM
    King's College London
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider27%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Integrator9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Government14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    University7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business45%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise27%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise70%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    LAN Switching
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies and others in LAN Switching. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco FabricPath is ranked 8th in LAN Switching with 22 reviews while IBM BNT is ranked 15th in LAN Switching. Cisco FabricPath is rated 8.2, while IBM BNT is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco FabricPath writes "On overall effective product with good performance and a simple setup ". On the other hand, Cisco FabricPath is most compared with Juniper QFabric, Cisco Nexus and Arista Campus LAN Switches, whereas IBM BNT is most compared with .

    See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.

    We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.