Cisco Hosted Unified Communications Services vs ShoreTel M5 Unified Communications as a Service comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Use ShoreTel M5 Unified Communications as a Service?
Ranking
Views
65
Comparisons
52
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
15
Comparisons
6
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
M5 Unified Communications as a Service, M5 Networks
Learn More
Overview
Cisco Hosted Unified Communications Services give businesses and government agencies the benefits of a converged IP communications network without them having to own, manage, or maintain a Cisco Unified Communications System.
Information Not Available
Sample Customers
IDEALondon, Lone Star College System, North West Redwater
Access Homehealth, Adrian College, All Erection Crane and Rental Corporation, Allied Telesis, Amarillo Independent School District, Anthony & Sylvan Pools, AP+M, Aquent, Archbishop Edward A. McCarthy High School, Auditoria Superior de la Ciudad

Cisco Hosted Unified Communications Services is ranked 9th in Unified Communications as a Service while ShoreTel M5 Unified Communications as a Service is ranked 18th in Unified Communications as a Service. Cisco Hosted Unified Communications Services is rated 9.0, while ShoreTel M5 Unified Communications as a Service is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Hosted Unified Communications Services writes "Product review for Cisco Unified Communications as a Service". On the other hand, Cisco Hosted Unified Communications Services is most compared with , whereas ShoreTel M5 Unified Communications as a Service is most compared with .

See our list of best Unified Communications as a Service vendors.

We monitor all Unified Communications as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.